1 Aug
2006
1 Aug
'06
8:51 p.m.
Hi,
it is done this way in the latest CVS version. loose_route uses the
domains stored in db table domain and checks if it is responsible for them.
You have to set domain's module pamater db_mode to 1 (cached mode), so
whenever you update the database, you'd need to invoke xmlrpm
domain.reload method (or restart ser).
Michal
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:45:36PM +0200, Weiter Leiter wrote:
Some UAs, when not explicitly configured with an
outbound proxy (some even
in this), follow rfc's recommendation of sending a request with a preloaded
route set containing one entry, that of what they think it is their outbound
proxy, determined through various means.
This is a problem when ser as a serving proxy for multiple domains does the
loose_route'ing: if the route entry in the message is an ip address, ser
will realise that it is him that must serve the request and everything goes
smooth. BUT if the client places a virtual domain in the route set, ser is
fooled to believe that it should just proxy forward the request.
Forwarding might be ok, as ser will forward to itself (suboptimal), but in
this case how can i prevent illegal relaying?
How should this be elegantly dealt with?
The most obvious answer is to add "alias"es, but i want to handle the
domains through domain module only. Shouldn't the domain module have some
functionality to load the domains as aliases (at least on demand by module
parameter)?
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers