Re: [Users] REGISTER expires and replication

Thanks again, It true that the expires is the same on both after registration. When it comes to sipura, I'm already in dialog with them.... (there should be somekind of certification checklist on sip phones....or maybe they should have the same bug all of them, at least it would be predictable ;-) )

Anyway, thanks alot. br hw On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 12:33 +0300, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: >Hi Helge, > >REGISTRAR module updated only the reply information, without touching >the request - usually, once got to the registrar, the path of the >REGISTRAR ends, so no sense to update it. > >In case of replication, it shouldn't be a problem if you set same expire >limitation on both servers. The backup registrar will apply same >limitations - just check via reply generated by it. > >Regarding the SIPURA - it's broken - you should send a bug report. > >regards, >bogdan > >Helge Waastad wrote: > > > >>Hi, >>I have a scenario in which I have a little bit of confusion.. >> >>I have a redundant setup, two OpenSER, a MySQL cluster and replication >>of REGISTERs. >> >>The UAC sends expires=3600 >>Both OpenSER's has a max_expires=1800, >>min_expires=300,default_expires=300 >> >>My Sipura-1001 has default expires=3600. >> >>In the OK message sent from the OpenSER handeling the REGISTER, >>expires=1800 is sent back to the UAC which is OK (However the Sipura >>does not obey this, which also is struggeling, but that is another >>story....) >> >>The replicated REGISTER, hovever, uses the original expiery from the >>UAC...expires=3600 >> >>Do I have to rewrite the expires in the replicated message? >> >> >> >> >>