Hello,
accounting using acc module just work fine if both servers write to same
database, there is nothing to sync in states between active and standby
server.
For rtpproxy, afaik, there is no hot HA system offered by the
application. For rtpengine, there were some patches circulating around
here (iirc, sent by Carsten Bock) to use a redis server for
active-standby sync. Also, because each call uses at least 4 ports, be
sure that the standby stays clean of other apps that can use ports which
can be used by the active server.
On the other hand, rtpproxy is rather basic UDP forwarder, unlikely to
crash. If you use rtpproxy on another system than kamailio, then you are
achieving the availability required by most of the services out there.
You should just use many rtpproxy at once, kamailio is able to work with
all of them (actually, this is recommended if you want to use properly
the CPU cores, because rtpproxy is single process application). If you
want to put the rtpproxy server in maintenance, use another host with
rtpproxy, reconfigure kamailio to use them and let the old ones running
for a while so existing calls keep going fine.
Over the time, I got to the conclusion that replicating a lot of states
during normal operations adds more overhead and problems than finding
specif solutions for particular very rare cases. Have in mind that rtp
stream means a lot of small packets, it is better to keep the handling
of them as simple as possible not to affect the QoS.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15/12/15 19:02, Frank Costeira wrote:
Hi,
I would prefer to maintain the dialog and rtp session, however push
come to shove maintaining the RTP session would be sufficient.
Is it possible to do state-full failover of both the dialog and rtp or
just rtp?
Any recommendations on documentation or how-to to read that would
point me in the right direction?
Thanks
Regards
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Alex Balashov
<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com <mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
Well, that depends. Is your objective really RTP failover, or also
failover of dialog state (e.g. for some accounting purpose)?
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30346
United States
Tel: +1-800-250-5920
<tel:%2B1-800-250-5920> (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671
<tel:%2B1-678-954-0671> (direct)
Web:
http://www.evaristesys.com/,
http://www.csrpswitch.com/
Sent from my BlackBerry.
Original Message
From: Frank Costeira
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 09:41
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Reply To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] State-full failover Kamailio+RTPProxy
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio -
http://www.asipto.com
http://miconda.eu