[Serusers] config for NAT/STUN

I am having trouble with getting messaging between two SIP clients each behind difference NATs, each making connection to SER using STUN. The clients are reaching each other successfully for the INVITE, ACK, REQUEST BYE messaging but during the call the clients are attempting to reach each other on their private IPs ie IPs behind their NATs. Is there a config alteration that I should make to fix ? Or am I looking in the wrong place ? My ser.cfg is below, thanks in advance Peter # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=7 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) # Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode #fork=no #log_stderror=yes check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/vm.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # Transaction Module Params modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 90) # Acounting Module Params # set the reporting log level modparam("acc", "log_level", 1) # number of flag, which will be used for accounting; if a message is labeled with this flag, its completion status will be reported modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 2) modparam("acc", "db_url", "mysql://xxx:xxx@localhost/ser") modparam("acc", "db_flag", 11) modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", 12) modparam("acc", "failed_transactions", 1) # !! Nathelper loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # !! Nathelper modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ /* ********* ROUTINE CHECKS ********************************** */ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # Process record-routing #if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; }; # labeled all transaction for accounting setflag(11); # record-route INVITES to make sure BYEs will visit our server too if (method=="INVITE") record_route(); # forward the request statefuly now; (we need *stateful* forwarding, # because the stateful mode correlates requests with replies and # drops retranmissions; otherwise, we would have to report on # every single message received) /* if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); break; }; */ # !! Nathelper # Special handling for NATed clients; first, NAT test is # executed: it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses # in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also, # the received test should, if completed, should check all # vias for rpesence of received if (nat_uac_test("3")) { # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is # a REGISTER if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) { log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n"); # This will work only for user agents that support symmetric # communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is # smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a configuration # option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is # called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling". fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling if (method == "INVITE") { fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP }; force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via setflag(11); # Mark as NATed }; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!uri=~"xxx.com.au") { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri=~"xxx.com.au") { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (!www_authorize("xxx.com.au", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("xxx.com.au", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri=~"xxx.com.au") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # attempt handoff to PSTN ## This assumes that the caller is registered in our realm if (uri=~"^sip:[0-9]*@sip.xxx.com.au") { log("Forwarding to PSTN\n"); t_relay_to_udp( "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx", "xxx"); ## Our Cisco router break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Foundx"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { # !! Nathelper /* if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !search("^Route:")){ sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP addresses"); break; }; */ # if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay if (isflagset(6)) { force_rtp_proxy(); }; # NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example, # re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as # NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies t_on_reply("1"); # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } # !! Nathelper onreply_route[1] { # NATed transaction ? if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy(); # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not # know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts) } else if (nat_uac_test("1")) { fix_nated_contact(); }; } --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.698 / Virus Database: 455 - Release Date: 6/2/2004