17 Nov
2018
17 Nov
'18
4:31 a.m.
Hello Daniel,
I compiled and i'm testing 5.2, but it doesn't seem to be doing what I was
expecting, my config is as follows:
route[DISPATCH] {
dp_match("1", "$ru");
if(!ds_select_routes("1=4;11=9", "ruri", "10"))
{
send_reply("404", "No destination");
exit;
} else {
xlog("[DISPATCH] ds_select_dst was succesful\n");
}
xlog("L_DBG", "--- SCRIPT: going to <$ru> via
<$du>\n");
t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH");
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
And my table is:
+----+-------+------------------------------------+-------+----------+----------------------------+-------------+
| id | setid | destination | flags | priority |
attrs | description |
+----+-------+------------------------------------+-------+----------+----------------------------+-------------+
| 213 | 1 | sip:34.201.28.49:5080 | 0 | 10 |
weight=100 | node1-proxy |
| 229 | 1 | sip:54.209.229.198:5080 | 0 | 10 |
weight=100 | node2-proxy |
| 232 | 11 | sip:35.170.67.206:5080 | 0 | 10 |
weight=100 | node3-proxy |
+----+-------+------------------------------------+-------+----------+----------------------------+-------------+
But kamailio is always sending to the same ip 198, although it should be
load-balancing round-robin to the 2 nodes on setid 1. And when those 2
nodes have 10 calls, then start sending to setid 11.
Is my config wrong?
Regards,
David Villasmil
email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com
phone: +34669448337
ᐧ
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 4:09 PM David Villasmil <
david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ah, 5.2 branch. Will test it, thanks!
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 16:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> besides master, you can also use branch 5.2 -- this is going to be used
> to release 5.2.0 and other future 5.2.x versions. Those two branches have
> the same version of the module at this moment.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> On 15.11.18 16:48, David Villasmil wrote:
>
> Hey Daniel,
>
> Thanks for replying. Can I test this from master?
>
> David
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 15:12, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> On 14.11.18 23:16, David Villasmil wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Is it possible to set an algorithm like the following?
>> >
>> > fs1 - Priority 10 - maxload 20 calls
>> > fs2 - Priority 10 - maxload 20 calls
>> > fs3 - Priority 9 - maxload 20 calls
>> > fs4 - Priority 8 - maxload 20 calls
>> > fs5 - Priority 7 - maxload 20 calls
>> >
>> > So that, whenever any new call comes in, fs1 and fs2 would be used,
>> > meaning the fs with the highest priority would be use UNLESS there's
>> > 20 calls on that server, in which case, the next server with the
>> > highest priority would be used.
>> >
>> this should be easier possible with the upcoming 5.2.0 (to be released
>> in about 2 weeks or so), see:
>>
>> -
>>
>>
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/dispatcher.html#dispatc…
>>
>> For older versions you may need to do more complex logic in the
>> configuration file to call dispatcher for different groups at different
>> stages of failure re-routing.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- www.asipto.com
>>
>> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- www.asipto.com
>
>