15 Mar
2014
15 Mar
'14
12:27 a.m.
On 14/03/14 23:24, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
looking strictly to that,
you are not, set the rpid related parameter to "".
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - April 2-4, 2014, Berlin, Germany
http://www.kamailioworld.com
However, so far dependencies in the readme were
listing the modules to
which are internal bindings to access their functions/values. In this
case is no direct binding from siputils to pv. The pv framework is in
the core and it is what siputils uses, but the implementation of the avp
as pseudo variable is in pv module.
i didn't understand. if i'm not using
rpid related siputils functions
that deal with avps, why am i required to load pv module?