How many gateways you could possible try? More than 100?
Perhaps you can use a while loop instead of recursive subroute executions.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 11 Mar 2014, at 14:01, Camila Troncoso
<ctroncoso(a)redvoiss.net> wrote:
Daniel,
Attached will you find the graph.
I don’t really understand much of it.
My route CHANNELS is where I check if the gateway is full, if that is the case , a go
back to RELAY route , load next_gw() and then look for the channels capacity from the new
gateway .
If I received a failure response , I load next_gw and check for channels.
Regards,
Camila
De: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org]
En nombre de Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Enviado el: lunes, 10 de marzo de 2014 17:11
Para: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Asunto: Re: [SR-Users] too many recursive routing table lookups
This is when you have a recursive loop or too many chained subroutes executed. Like:
request_route {
route(x);
}
route[x] {
route(y);
}
route[y] {
route(x);
}
if you have sources of kamailio, then you can check with:
./utils/route_graph/route_graph.py /path/to/kamailio.cfg
See if you can spot the loop.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/03/14 20:36, Camila Troncoso wrote:
I have another ERROR that is presenting:
“WARNING: too many recursive routing table lookups (101) giving up!”
I have a routing diagram that includes max number of channels per gateway. The dialog
module keeps track of the number of channels use by active calls ( set_dlg_profile,
get_profile_size) and if a gateway has reached his maximum , I search for next_gw().
This recursive mechanism can be made several times if many gateways of one route are
full.
But I analyzed the error and I have maximum 24 repeats of this process per call, never
reach 100 repeats as shown by the ERROR.
Can the maximum value of recursive lookups be the sum of lookups counting all the early
dialogs?
Regards,
Camila
De: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com]
Enviado el: lunes, 10 de marzo de 2014 14:21
Para: Camila Troncoso; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Asunto: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio LCR unable to relay new calls, memory issue
Indeed, “kamctl fifo get_statistics all” is the same as "kamctl stats" in newer
versions.
You run with default 32MB which is rather low, imo. You have less than 1MB free at this
moment.
Start kamailio with larger memory, like -m 512. It is not going to be taken from the
system unless kamailio is really using it.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/03/14 17:01, Camila Troncoso wrote:
Daniel,
With the command “ kamctl fifo get_statistics all” i get this:
shmem:fragments = 2565
shmem:free_size = 1028552
shmem:max_used_size = 33554432
shmem:real_used_size = 32525880
shmem:total_size = 33554432
shmem:used_size = 26417552
Regards,
Camila
De: Camila Troncoso [mailto:ctroncoso@redvoiss.net]
Enviado el: lunes, 10 de marzo de 2014 12:43
Para: 'miconda(a)gmail.com'com'; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Asunto: RE: [SR-Users] Kamailio LCR unable to relay new calls, memory issue
Daniel,
I haven’t use the –m command.
I´m running kamailio 3.2.4 version.
The command kamctl stats is not available.
Regards,
Camila
De: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org]
En nombre de Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Enviado el: lunes, 10 de marzo de 2014 11:52
Para: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Asunto: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio LCR unable to relay new calls, memory issue
Hello,
how much shared memory have you allocated to kamailio? In other words, have you given any
value via -m command line parameter?
You can see it also via:
kamctl stats
Look for shmem fields.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/03/14 14:37, Camila Troncoso wrote:
Hi,
Last Friday I presented a increase of load in kamailio by a client. The load was almost
twice as usual. By that time I encountered with many issues in kamailio. The calls were
not relay to gateways, and a lot of messages about memory were appearing in log file.
Kamailio didn’t crash. When I remove the extra traffic all went back to normal. Is there
a issue about memory leak or about to few memory resources to manage this amount of
traffic?
ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:1799]: ERROR: relay_reply: cannot alloc reply shmem
ERROR: <core> [msg_translator.c:1782]: ERROR: build_req_buf_from_sip_req: out of
memory
ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:431]: ERROR: print_uac_request: no shm mem
ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1534]: ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches
ERROR: tm [tm.c:1369]: ERROR: w_t_relay_to: t_relay_to failed
ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:598]: ERROR: _reply_light: cannot allocate shmem buffer
ERROR: tm [t_msgbuilder.c:371]: ERROR: cannot allocate shared memory
ERROR: tm [t_msgbuilder.c:521]: ERROR: build_local_reparse: cannot build ACK request
MERROR: tm [t_msgbuilder.c:371]: ERROR: cannot allocate shared memory
ERROR: tm [t_msgbuilder.c:521]: ERROR: build_local_reparse: cannot build ACK request
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:282]: ERROR: sl_reply_error used: No error (2/SL)
ERROR: <core> [msg_translator.c:1782]: ERROR: build_req_buf_from_sip_req: out of
memory
ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:431]: ERROR: print_uac_request:/p>
ERROR: <core> [msg_translator.c:1782]: ERROR: build_req_buf_from_sip_req: out of
memory
ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:431]: ERROR: print_uac_request: no shm mem
ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1534]: ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches
ERROR: tm [tm.c:1369]: ERROR: w_t_relay_to: t_relay_to failed
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:282]: ERROR: sl_reply_error used: No error (2/SL)
ERROR: <core> [sip_msg_clone.c:506]: ERROR: sip_msg_cloner: cannot allocate memory
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1338]: ERROR: new_t: out of mem:
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1478]: ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:282]: ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server
error occurred (1/SL)
Regards,
Camila
<image001.gif>
Camila Troncoso Solar | Ingeniero de Desarollo
+56 2 22408535 · +56 9 97327220 | ctroncoso(a)redvoiss.net
Badajoz 130, piso 16, Las Condes | Santiago - CHILE |
www.redvoiss.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - April 2-4, 2014, Berlin, Germany
http://www.kamailioworld.com
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - April 2-4, 2014, Berlin, Germany
http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - April 2-4, 2014, Berlin, Germany
http://www.kamailioworld.com
D"http://www.kamailioworld.com">http://www.kamailioworld.com
<graph.txt>