Re: [Kamailio-Users] removal of tag-param in To Header

2009/4/1 Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at:

...

But I really wonder why you need to remove the To tag in an in-dialog request.

A common use case is a SIP client which gets confused by multiple early dialogs (e.g. Asterisk in pedenatic mode). Just remove the totags from the responses 101-199 and you are done.

Wow! Asterisk in pedantic mode (theorically this means more RFC 3261 compliant) requires To tag in provisional 1XX responses to be removed in case of getting forked responses!

What will be the next? requiring just one Via header? requiring media address in SDP being the same as address in Contact header? requiring a new propietary header "Require: x-digium" ?

Amazing.