Hi Maxim, Will the next version of rtpproxy run on the same box as ser runs? Or it will be possible to use one server for sip signaling and another for rtp streams only?
--- Maxim Sobolev sobomax@portaone.com wrote:
Craig Graham wrote:
I have a very small setup; at the office there's a
few machines behind an
Intertex IX66 NAT box, that does a fairly good job
of SIP as far as we can
tell from the few connections we've had to other
sites.
At home, I have a few machines behind a Linux box,
doing NAT. All user
machines are running MS Messenger.
For a long time I've been trying to get a decent
SIP service at home. I've
tried both Partysip and Siproxd, both of which
give me voice connections but
no presence, IM, video or additional streams for
whiteboards or Messenger's
"application sharing."
I've been picking up snippets about NATHelper,
which as I understand it
allows SER to run on a NAT box and allow people to
call across the NAT box.
However, I've also seen a couple of messages that
suggest that as of October
this module was only handling single audio
streams, which is the same as I
have at the moment with Partysip and Siproxd. Is
my understanding right and
I'll have to wait a bit longer before trying SER,
or does it already do
multistream?
Multistream is video + audio, right? If so, then yes, only single audio stream is supported at the moment, though it would be trivial to add support for multistream as well. Please also note that currently I am working on next version of nathelper/rtpproxy, which would allow "bridging", i.e. the configuration when ser/rtpproxy runs on NAT box, listens on both private and public addresses and relays SIP/RTP traffic between public and private interfaces.
-Maxim
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus