Jiri Kuthan wrote:
beg my pardon, but I don't really think that one
needs a session border control, particularly
becasue of the reasons related to bad scalability, bandwidth waste and latency. Sinle
point
of failure is another concern.
Yes, I wasn't looking for "far end" (in the service provider) solutions,
but the "near end" seems appropriate...
Anyway, I was looking for a smaller solution, something for small
offices, from 2 to 10-20 phones.
Now I was asking myself if an Asterisk solution could work.
Can Asterisk work as a SIP proxy behind a NAT?
Does it have a STUN client?
Thanks.
At 02:20 PM 8/26/2005, Carlo wrote:
What you need is a session border control.
Try this link from Jasomi :
http://www.jasomi.com/ppfes.html
or this from Kagoor ( now Juniper )
http://www.juniper.net/customers/support/products/vf1000.jsp
Federico Giannici ha scritto:
Considering that we DON'T want to use an RTP
Proxy (bad scalability, waste of bandwidth and longer delays), is there any solution to
the "hairpin" problems?
Are there any "boxes" that look at the SIP messages and short-circuit calls from
and to the local network?
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan
http://iptel.org/~jiri/
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
___________________________________________________
__
|- giannici(a)neomedia.it
|ederico Giannici
http://www.neomedia.it
___________________________________________________