29 Nov
2023
29 Nov
'23
7:10 p.m.
Hi Ilie,
Glad it worked out for you, and thank you for forcing me to take a second look at the
mechanics of this for myself. You could say we both learned something. :-) Likewise thank
you to Daniel for the clarity.
-- Alex
On 29 Nov 2023, at 11:08, Ilie Soltanici
<iliusha.md(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your reply. Indeed, it's based on this parameter - our objective, however,
is to avoid altering the global behavior of this parameter for a specific feature that
relies on the response from evapi_async_relay.
The feature is not critical for the call at all, so in our case it makes no sense to
delay the call for about 10 seconds if, for any reason, our external application fails to
respond within the first second.
Finally, I figured out:
t_set_fr(5000, 1000);
It's actually the fr_timeout I needed to change, and not fr_inv_timeout (which I was
trying initially), and that makes sense as there is no provisional reply from the end
device yet.
With this configuration, the call is relayed to the end device after 1 second if the
external application doesn't provide a reply within that timeframe.
Thanks again for your help.
Regards,
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 14:25, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> wrote:
Hi Ilie,
I think the confusion is about behaviour rather than transaction reality. A transaction
suspended by evapi_async_relay() does not generate any productive replies back to the UAC,
it's true.
But it does go away, as Daniel says. Setting an example `fr_timer` value of 4 sec:
loadmodule "tm"
modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 4000)
Then placing a test call at ~14:20:05, while echoing the output of RPC `tm.stats`:
bash-5.1# while : ; do date; kamcmd tm.stats | grep -i current; echo; sleep 1; done
Wed Nov 29 14:20:01 UTC 2023
current: 0
Wed Nov 29 14:20:02 UTC 2023
current: 0
Wed Nov 29 14:20:03 UTC 2023
current: 0
Wed Nov 29 14:20:04 UTC 2023
current: 0
Wed Nov 29 14:20:05 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:20:06 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:20:07 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:20:08 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:20:09 UTC 2023
current: 0
Wed Nov 29 14:20:10 UTC 2023
current: 0
Wed Nov 29 14:20:11 UTC 2023
current: 0
If I reset the `fr_timer` value to 10 sec, we can confirm that this is the modulator:
modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 1000)
Wed Nov 29 14:23:50 UTC 2023
current: 0
Wed Nov 29 14:23:51 UTC 2023
current: 0
Wed Nov 29 14:23:52 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:23:53 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:23:54 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:23:55 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:23:56 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:23:57 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:23:58 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:23:59 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:24:00 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:24:01 UTC 2023
current: 1
Wed Nov 29 14:24:02 UTC 2023
current: 0
Wed Nov 29 14:24:03 UTC 2023
current: 0
I think we can also agree that the timing of the transaction reaping is a bit
"approximate".
But equally well, it is quite true that the reaping is silent and there is no 408 Request
Timeout reply backwards to the UAC.
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov
Principal Consultant
Evariste Systems LLC
Web: https://evaristesys.com
Tel: +1-706-510-6800
On 29 Nov 2023, at 08:31, Ilie Soltanici via
sr-users <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote:
HI Daniel,
That would be great if it were possible, unfortunately, the code I attempted doesn't
seem to be working. Here's the code snippet I tried:
route[TEST] {
t_set_fr(1000);
t_on_failure("CONTACT_LOOKUP_FAILED");
evapi_async_relay({"field":"value"})
}
failure_route[CONTACT_LOOKUP_FAILED] {
xlogl("L_INFO","Failed Transaction ID
[$T(id_index):$T(id_label)]\n");
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
I'm wondering if there might be something I'm overlooking?
Regards,
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 12:42, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
a suspended transaction is kept silently for the duration of the timeout (see
t_set_fr()), then it fails and jumps to a failure route (if you set one) -- maybe you can
leverage this mechanism somehow.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 29.11.23 12:53, Ilie Soltanici via sr-users wrote:
--
Alex Balashov
Principal Consultant
Evariste Systems LLC
Web: https://evaristesys.com
Tel: +1-706-510-6800
Hello,
I'm trying to use the evapi_async_relay function from the evapi module, however,I
don't want the transaction to be suspended for more than 1 second.
For instance, if there's no response from the external application within this time
frame, I want the script to continue and remove that transaction from memory.
One potential approach I am considering is to add suspended transactions to a hash table
with a timestamp value. Then, using rtimer module, I could periodically parse this table
every second and process the results, but I'm not sure how efficient is that.
Maybe you know other alternative, more efficient solutions (from a performance point of
view) that could achieve the same goal?
Any insights or recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com)
twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Consultancy and Development Services
Kamailio Advanced Training -- asipto.com
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: