Re: [SR-Users] Crash Kamailio 4.1.3

Hello,

if you get a record for 180 response, then you have also the early_media parameter set for acc module, isn't it?

In the morning I pushed a patch that should fix this issue. Use latest release 4.1.4 and see if works fine. Report the results to know that it is gone or not.

Cheers, Daniel

On 12/06/14 16:55, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:

Hello,

We don't use $ai in xlog nor in other process. only in ACC.

parameters for ACC are : modparam("acc", "db_flag", FLT_ACC) modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", 3) modparam("acc", "db_url", DBURLWO) modparam("acc", "db_extra", "src_user=$fU;username=$Au;src_domain=$fd;src_ip=$si;src_pai=$ai;" "dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd")

For the 3781-4b1-572014182635-OGNAJ-1-A.B.C.D there is a code 180 ringing in the INVITE in ACC table.

regards,

Igor

2014-06-11 23:01 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com>:

Few more things...

Are you recording 1xx events? Can you check to see if there is
another record in acc table for the same call? You can search by
call-id 3781-4b1-572014182635-OGNAJ-1-A.B.C.D

Eventually, send also the parameters you set for acc module.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 11/06/14 19:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

...

Hello,

so you don't print $ai in xlog() statements nor use it in any
assignments or other functions besides acc parameter?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 11/06/14 19:19, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:

...

Hello,

We do not access to the P-asserted-identity in our configuration
but we added the field PAI in the db base ACC ( for INVITE, ACK
and BYE) .
I dont know if it's in request_route, failure_route or
branch_route .

This is the print :

(gdb) p mem_block
$3 = (struct qm_block *) 0x7f6a6bef1010
(gdb) p shm_block
$4 = (struct qm_block *) 0x7f6a5666a000

Regards,

Igor


2014-06-11 18:02 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda@gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:

    Hello,

    cloning to shm for tm seems ok. Can you tell where you
    access P-Asserted-Identity header, via variables? Does it
    happen in request_route, failure_route or branch_route?

    Can you print from gdb, any frame:

    p mem_block
    p shm_block

    I want to see if parsed filed point to shm or pkg memory.

    Cheers,
    Daniel


    On 11/06/14 17:37, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

...

    Hello,

    at least I narrowed it down a bit. It is empty also in the
    clone stored in transaction, so it happens either during
    cloning or before. I will have to check these parts.

    Cheers,
    Daniel

    On 11/06/14 17:00, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:

...

    Hello,

    This is the result, always for frame 5 :

    (gdb) p *t->uas.request->pai
    $1 = {type = HDR_PAI_T, name = {
        s = 0x7f6a60cd34b8 "P-Asserted-Identity:
    \"0987654321\"<sip:0987654321@A.B.C.D>\r\nContact:
    <sip:0987654321@A.B.C.D:5060>\r\nAllow: INVITE, BYE,
    REGISTER, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO,
    REFER, UPD"..., len = 19}, body = {
        s = 0x7f6a60cd34cd
    "\"0987654321\"<sip:0987654321@A.B.C.D>\r\nContact:
    <sip:0987654321@A.B.C.D:5060>\r\nAllow: INVITE, BYE,
    REGISTER, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO,
    REFER, UPDATE\r\nSupported: path,"..., len = 43}, len =
    66, parsed = 0x7f6a6d81da88, next = 0x7f6a60cd3f10}

    (gdb) p *((p_id_body_t*)(t->uas.request->pai->parsed))
    $2 = {id = 0x0, num_ids = 0, next = 0x0}

    *Did *you find one thing in**common between the 2
    occurrences? Do you have any ideas about what is the cause
    of this pai reset?

    Regards,

    Igor




    2014-06-11 16:09 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
    <miconda@gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:

        Hello,

        in the same frame 5, can yo get:

        p *t->uas.request->pai
        p *((p_id_body_t*)(t->uas.request->pai->parsed))

        Cheers,
        Daniel


        On 10/06/14 18:35, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:

...

        Hello,

        Here is the results :
        _
        _
        (gdb) frame 5
        #5 0x00007f6a687e9b43 in acc_onreply
        (t=0x7f6a60d16ff8, req=0x7f6a60cd2c10,
        reply=0x7f6a6c119aa8, code=200) at acc_logic.c:471
        471 acc_db_request(req);

        -- 
        Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
        http://twitter.com/#!/miconda  <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>  -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

    -- 
    Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
    http://twitter.com/#!/miconda  <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>  -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

    -- 
    Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
    http://twitter.com/#!/miconda  <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>  -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda  <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>  -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda  <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>  -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda