If you forward like this:
Public IP ---> Private IP
You should forward port 5060 + the UDP range used in rtpproxy/mediaproxy.
Use advertised_address directive in addition to listen.
The standard getting started NAT configs assumes that you have no local
user agents, and just do far-end NAT traversal.
g-)
TZieleniewski wrote:
Hi!!
Right now I have SER based voip system but inside the local network.
I would like to enable the external internet connection.
Is it possible to realize the NAT handling but with SER-RTPProxy or
SER-MediaProxy
not with the public IP so still in the local net but with the strict
forwarding rules on the router.
where router ofcaurse has the public IP
So that for instance having SER and media proxy inside local network but
with whole SIP traffic routed to SER and RTP to media proxy??
Is one of the above methods more recommened at the moment with ser2??
Thank you in advance
Best
Tomasz
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers