Re: [Serusers] Failover PSTN Gateways

Just out of curiosity, in the document you mention that subsequent requests (ACK, BYE) go to the same gateway, but that is something that would happen anyway because the gateway puts its Contact into reply and record-routing will route subsequent messages to that contact. Do you plan to write any additional support for that or did I just misunderstand the text ?

Jan. On 02-09 11:18, Adrian Georgescu wrote: > December 2004 > > On Sep 2, 2004, at 6:31 AM, Atle Samuelsen wrote: > >> Howdy Adrian! >> >> Do you know when you whing you'll be finnish with this project? or >> atleast ready for use? >> >> >> -atle >> >> * Adrian Georgescu <ag(a)ag-projects.com> [040902 00:42]: >>> There is some work in progress: >>> >>> http://download.dns-hosting.info/SERLCR/README >>> >>> Adrian >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> Hi list, >>> >>> We have a setup with 2 redundant stateful SER SIP-Servers with >>> accounting. >>> >>> For calls to the PSTN we have 2 ISDN-PRI gateways connected to >>> different ISDN-PRI lines. >>> >>> We need to implement a dynamic failover mechanism and load >>> balancing. >>> >>> a) Incoming calls: No problem, the PSTN switch takes care of that >>> b) Outgoing calls: >>> Both GWs are registered at both SERs; calls are usually relayed >>> with >>> "t_relay_to_udp(x.x.x.x, "5060");" >>> But how can I implement a quick failover including >>> load-distribution >>> between those gatways? >>> I.e. if I receive "busy here" or no response after a short period >>> after the "invite", the call should be redirected to the other GW. >>> >>> Thanks in advance for your help! >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Gerhard >>> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Serusers mailing list >>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers