Re: [SR-Users] Unexpected evaluation to false on a phonenumber in $avp

On 06/01/15 10:21, Daniel Tryba wrote:

On Monday 05 January 2015 18:57:00 Victor Seva wrote:

...

Check http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/modules/siputils.html#siputils.f .is_e164

Thanks for the pointer but the value doesn't necesarrily contain e164 numbers, for example the value might contain the Dutch harmonized carrier voicemail number (1233).

My question/observation is why are "+31xxxxxxxxx" or "+49xxxxxxxxx" considered true and "+41xxxxxxxxx" evaluated false?

If it gets over 2^31, it becomes negative and when not an explicit logical expression, there are the rules with negative response code is false and positive is true.

You can use 'defined' or pv_is_set() to test if an avp has a value.

Cheers, Daniel