[Serusers] Re: [Serdev] NAT traversal of the BYE transaction

No, I do that only in case of REGISTER . if (client_nat_test("3")) { if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("Record-Route:")) { fix_contact(); force_rport(); } } Thank you, Andrea ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Georgescu" <ag(a)ag-projects.com> To: "Andrea Bondavalli" <a.bondavalli(a)inet.it> Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 11:39 AM Subject: Re: [Serdev] NAT traversal of the BYE transaction > Do you have something like this into your configuration? > > if (client_nat_test("3")) { > force_rport(); > fix_contact(); > }; > > On Jul 16, 2004, at 11:27 AM, Andrea Bondavalli wrote: > >> As you can see from the following traces the Via field >> (Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 192.168.0.10:5060;received=213.92.1.143;branch=z9hG4bK-fdee73bb) >> of the BYE sent by 213.92.1.178:5060 to 213.92.1.197:5060 doesn't >> report >> the port number of the incoming interface (rport=1029). > > The final result is that the answer (200 OK) is sent back to > the wrong port number (5060 instead of 1029).