2 Nov
2005
2 Nov
'05
2:28 p.m.
I agree, I mean the next step would be to charge ebay and yahoo per
transaction, just wondering how easy it would be for ISP to setup a
monitor and a billing model on this
Iqbal
sip wrote:
I think that would get a LOT of pushback and may end up
really screwing SBC.
If they begin to self-regulate the TYPE of traffic going over their
connection, they open themselves to a tremendous number of legal hurdles not
the least of which being the fact that they're trying to live as an
unregulated service provider.
That being said, they COULD keep track of Vonage traffic in that they can keep
track of any traffic going straight to Vonage's servers, but as Vonage doesn't
care a) whether or not the traffic passes through SBC's network in order to
reach them and b) likely hasn't signed any sort of agreement which would ALLOW
them to start charging, then SBC simply can't charge Vonage without a contract
no matter what they'd LIKE to do.
Now, they could say that unless Vonage starts paying them fees for additional
usage, that they're going to cut off access to Vonage's equipment, but they
have to be VERY careful going down that road. If they don't have an equally
viable and effective product set up for people, they're shooting themselves in
the foot. There's also the negative stigma that advertising could very easily
put on the move "SBC is trying to keep you from making cheap phone calls."
"If SBC does this, you will still be required to live out your contractual
obligations to Vonage (and yes I know they say there are none, but you didn't
read the fine print :) )! Switch to XXX Internet provider so this doesn't
happen!" Etc, etc.
If SBC has a lot of Vonage users, they might find themselves having a drastic
reduction in userbase on such a move. If they DON'T have a lot of Vonage
users, Vonage isn't liable to care too much, but the media war that would
ensue with the information that SBC doesn't let people get inexpensive phone
service might still put a huge damper on SBCs growth.
I'm not sure they've throught that one through very carefully.
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:13:01 +0000, Iqbal wrote
The basis behind the query was because the CEO of
SBC said a few
days ago that they "may" start charging companies like Vonage
Iqbal
Roger Lewau wrote:
.
Hello
Interesting thought, but I dont see why there would be a need or even a wish
to charge once for the Internet access with an agreed Speed or data transfer
limit, and then again for the type of traffic unless that specific traffic
is treated differently in the ISP network, as wth higher CoS. Why else would
they care what kind of traffic you are running on your connection as long it
is kept within the agreed speed/data transfer limit? But giving voip traffic
different CoS over the providers network as a differentiator to enable voice
traffic billing does not seem logical unless all providers on Internet do
the same, and map the CoS between the providers at peering points.
I do not see how the VoIP providers would ever accept such an approach from
any ISP.
IP traffic is IP Traffic! You pay for the amount of traffic you send and
receive. More traffic equals higher revenue for the ISP, no need to charge
traffic differently just because the traffic happens to be VoIP and the ISP
has its roots in Telecom industry. I believe that the natural development of
this would be that most of the ISPs also start to offer the VoIP services.
It make a lot more sense to use the ISP as the VoIP provider than any remote
provider, since that will increase performance, reliability and make the
whole 911 issue and technical troubleshooting a lot easier. I strongly
believe that the ISPs at all levels will most likely replace the old PTTs
over the next 5-10 years. And in the case of PTTs also being an ISP, lucky
them.
I think, Companies like Vonage probably will be outrun by ISPs providing
VoIP in the long run, but they will stay behind as alternate providers or as
gateways to the old pstn networks.
Regards
Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: Iqbal <iqbal(a)gigo.co.uk>
To: "serusers(a)iptel.org" <serusers(a)iptel.org>
Cc: "users openser.org" <users(a)openser.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:54:35 +0000
Subject: [Serusers] voip charging by ISP's
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)iptel.org
http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi
i was looking into a model where ISP may charge (SBC is already thiking
of charging Vonage :-)), now if an ISP wanted to charge, all they would
need is to extract the INVITE, BYE and all the stuff in the middle, to
do some billing per VoIP provider sending traffic on there network, is
anyone aware of any sniffers which could do this not from a proxy, but
from the network level at a ISP end.
Iqbal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)iptel.org
http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.