21 Mar
2007
21 Mar
'07
9:04 p.m.
Hi.
I will do it Daniel. Thanks for the information.
About the tests, I am currently using 8 sipp instances (4 in each machine)
and I am pretty closer to the performance you gained.
I will try Openser 64 bit.
Thanks again.
Kind regards.
Sergio G.
On 3/21/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hello,
On 03/21/07 21:44, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
start
different
performance
UlraSPARC
$
specifications,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Daniel.
Some time ago, I tried to compile Openser for 64 bits, but I had
problems with libradiusclient, when It was compiled for 64 bits.
Is that problem solved? Could I run Openser + MySQL + Radius support
compiled as 64 bit?
haven't tried myself, but as I could see, there were
several fixes for
libradiusclient on 64b. You should give another try.
Cheers,
Daniel
Kind regards.
Sergio G.
On 3/21/07, *Daniel-Constantin Mierla* <daniel(a)voice-system.ro
<mailto: daniel(a)voice-system.ro>> wrote:
Hello,
On 03/21/07 20:14, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
> Hi Daniel.
>
> I am repeating the test using 6 instances of SIPp, and I am having
a
better
performance.
A question. In the page you have listed that the Proxy and UAS
runs on
a 64 bit machine. Was the compilation done to
generate a 64 bit
executable?
yes, it was 64bit executable. OS is Debian amd64.
Cheers,
Daniel
Thanks.
Kind regards.
Sergio Gutierrez
On 3/21/07, *Sergio Gutierrez* <saguti(a)gmail.com
<mailto:
saguti(a)gmail.com>
<mailto:saguti@gmail.com
<mailto:saguti@gmail.com>>> wrote:
Hi Daniel.
Thanks for your answer.
My configs are as the same used in published tests, and my
UAS, as
described is another instance of Openser.
I will try what you sugest.
Thanks.
Sergio Gutiérrez.
On 3/21/07, *Daniel-Constantin Mierla* <
daniel(a)voice-system.ro
<mailto:daniel@voice-system.ro>
<mailto: daniel(a)voice-system.ro
<mailto:daniel@voice-system.ro>>> wrote:
Hello,
do you use same configs as in published tests? The UAS
is another
openser with just sending a 200 ok reply
or sipp with uas
scenario?
First check what is the capacity of sipp -- make a very
simple
> config
> with just sl_send_reply("200","ok") in main route
and
sipp. See
what results you get and that should be the reference
for sipp
> capacity.
> Also, try to use multiple instances of sipp, from
servers, see
if you get the cumulative value better.
The tests were done on Core2 processor, and parallel
execution of
openser processes has some impact as
well.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03/21/07 16:52, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Currently I am installing Openser 1.2.0 on a Sun Fire
T2000
running
code for my
> > Processor (UltraSPARC T1), the results of the Solaris 10.
Although I used an optimized version of GCC for SPARC
Systems, and
> used the recommended settings to generate accurate
tests are
> just 50% of the presented ones on the web page.
>
> My setup is the following:
>
> Proxy and UAS: Sun Fire T2000, 8 GB RAM, 1 UltraSPARC
T1 1.2
> GHZ 6 Core.
> > UAC's: Two domain of a Sun Fire 12K, 4 GB RAM, 4
III+ 900 Mhz
> Software versions listed as on the webpage.
>
> openser -V output:
> version: openser 1.2.0-notls (sparc/solaris)
> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE,
USE_MCAST,
> > SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC,
> FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT-NOSMP
> > ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144,
> MAX_LISTEN 16,
> > MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
> > poll method support: poll, select, /dev/poll.
> > svnrevision: unknown
> > @(#) $Id: main.c 1827 2007-03-12 15:22:53Z bogdan_iancu main.c compiled on 21:43:51 Mar 19 2007 with gcc
4.0.3
I would thank any idea about how could I improve the
performnace of my
> setup. I think that because of the hardware the result
> should be at least equal than listed.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Kind regards.
>
> Sergio Gutiérrez.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)openser.org <mailto:Users@openser.org>
<mailto:Users@openser.org <mailto: Users(a)openser.org>>