Hello,
doesn't the ACK have a Route header for K1 and double Route headers for K2? K1 should use the first Route of K2 for routing, not the R-URI.
Cheers, Daniel
On 03/03/15 05:14, Kelvin Chua wrote:
I have 2 kamailio servers and 1 asterisk server.
- asterisk calls kamailio1
- kamailio1 relays INVITE to kamailio2
- kamailio2 relays INVITE to client registered using TLS
- client answers with 200 OK, sends to kamailio2
- kamailio2 relays 200 OK to kamailio1
- kamailio1 relays 200 OK to asterisk
- asterisk sends ACK to kamailio1
- kamailio1 complains "forward_request(): forward_req: ERROR: cannot
forward to af 2, proto 3 no corresponding listening socket" which is because 200 OK has a contact header with tls transport from client 9. call drops in 30 secs which is expected because client never received the ACK
any ideas on a fix or workaround?
Kelvin Chua
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users