Hello Daniel
You are right. 200OK messages are also with private IPs.
I think the problem is that
since I call dlg_bridge with Kamailio's own IP
It sends INVITE messages to itself first then it routes INVITE msg to
user location.
Because of this i see two record routes in the INTIVE headers and 200
reply headers.
if (is_reply()) {
if(isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) {
if(is_first_hop())
set_contact_alias();
}
}
But according to this code in NATMANAGE block, it only set contact if it
is first hope.
Since these messages have two record routes, this code block does not
modify contact field
Am I right? or Am I missing something else?
Thanks
Huseyin
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
<miconda@gmail.com>miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
dlg_bridge is not using the location table at all, because it has to
use the contact from 200ok of INVITE.
Have you used set_contact_alias() for natted 200ok received for INVITE?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27/04/16 11:15, huseyin kalyoncu wrote:
Hello Daniel
This is the sample output from our location table;
kamailio=# select username,contact,received,user_agent from location
where username='5678*0012';
username | contact | received |
user_agent
-----------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+---------------------
5678*0012 | sip:5678* <http://0012@192.168.1.21:5090>
0012@192.168.1.21:5090 | sip:DEVICE_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5090 |
Cisco/SPA504G-7.6.1
(1 row)
After calling dlg_bridge Kamailio firing INVITE and rings the device.
After answering on this device Kamailio firing REFER message.
But as you can see from ngrep output below, Kamailio is trying to send
this message to address in the contact field which is a private IP.
U 2016/04/27 10:58:25.745935 KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5090 ->
192.168.1.21:5090
REFER sip:5678* <http://0012@192.168.1.21:5090>0012@192.168.1.21:5090
SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5090;branch=z9hG4bK0ab8.1c5e622e4af6b7b6c9ede7ade4a50bf8.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK0ab8.c8a54413000000000000000000000000.0.
To: <sip:5678*0012@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS>;tag=199aaa02310a0799i1.
From: <sip:click2call@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS>
;tag=0d71401ca91009b00be5953e2813d7e4-7471.
CSeq: 11 REFER.
Call-ID: 63dc8c8a5ea88a30-868@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS.
Max-Forwards: 69.
Content-Length: 0.
User-Agent: Kamailio.
Referred-By: sip:click2call@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS.
Refer-To: sip:5678*0002@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS.
Contact: <sip:click2call@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5060>.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
<miconda@gmail.com>miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can you send the ngrep trace for such case? I would like to look at
> the headers to understand properly what do you mean.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Daniel
>
> On 26/04/16 15:23, huseyin kalyoncu wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I am trying to implement click 2 call functionality on Kamailio
> with dlg_bridge.
> But It seems that Kamailio routes REFER messages to devices according
> to Contact field of location table instead of Received field.
> But if the the IP in the Contact field is private REFER messages are
> failing so
> does the dlg_bridge.
>
>
> I called dlg_bridge in the config like this:
>
> dlg_bridge("sip:$param1", "sip:$param2",
> "sip:IP_ADDRESS_OF_KAMAILIO:5060");
>
> It rings the device in $param1 but after answering on that device
> Kamailio fails to send REFER if the Contact field for that device is
> Private IP.
> So it fails to initiate a call.
>
> How can I force Kamailio to use Received field for REFER messages
> instead of Contact field?
>
> Thanks
> Huseyin
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin
Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin
Mierlahttp://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users