24 Nov
2005
24 Nov
'05
10:14 a.m.
Sorry for the delay in answering this - I am not in
the office this
week. Using Greger's advice, I was able to get the detection of same
NAT working (sometimes - depends on me calling nathelper I think), but
due to other pressures (to do with getting cascading rtpproxy set up
with rtpproxy running in bridge mode) I have had to delay implementing
the solution fully. When I do I will of course share with all... I
think that it will be a case of doing the detection before messing with
the contact with nathelper, and then using that to decide whether
fix_nated_contact is called.
Sounds like the right approach. Look forward to hearing from you on this.
g-)
Noel
Greger V. Teigre wrote:
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-November/025541.html
I never heard from Noel if he made it work. Noel?
g-)
----- Original Message ----- From: "deviator" <deviator(a)inbox.ru>
To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 8:00 PM
Subject: [Serusers] Same NAT again
Hello!
Can someone explain me how i can correctly check if 2 UA's are behind
same NAT ?
for example: A and B UA's have private 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2, SER
have a public ip
A calling B
For A all is clear for me - SRCIP have an A external ip and i can use it
But i dont see any B external ip, RURI have a private ip part
(192.168.1.2)
Pls show me the way!
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers