Thanks Klaus,
I just was wondering if there was something I could configure in my proxy.
Ricardo
-----Mensaje original-----
De: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org]
En nombre de Klaus Darilion
Enviado el: miércoles, 16 de marzo de 2011 10:41
Para: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
Asunto: Re: [SR-Users] ACK not sent and rr-enforced
This trace is more or less useless - at least I won't waste time reading
hex-code traces. next time use proper formating:
ngrep -Wbyline -t -q -P "" port 5060
Anyway, it seems that iptel's NAT traversal policy always assumes, that
the user agent is directly connected to iptel, without any proxy in-between.
regards
klaus
On 10.03.2011 13:49, Dominguez Jover, Ricardo wrote:
Hello Daniel, here it is.
Thanks
Ricardo
De: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com] Enviado el: jueves, 10 de marzo
de 2011 12:49
Para: Dominguez Jover, Ricardo
CC: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
Asunto: Re: [SR-Users] ACK not sent and rr-enforced
Hello,
can you post the ngrep trace of such call (fron incoming invite, to the bye, taken on
your server)? That will help to see what could be mismatching there.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Dominguez Jover, Ricardo<djover(a)umh.es> wrote:
Hi again,
I'm still working in this issue. I've noticed that iptel proxy is writing in the
ACK message the following:
ACK sip:username@myproxyIP:5060;..... -> ACK is not sent to the client.
tcheck_trans fails. If a force the transfer -> t_relay do nothing
while sip2sip and VoIP-Talk are writing:
ACK sip:username@userprivateIP:5060;.... -> ACK is sent to the client
In both cases, contact URI sent in the 200 OK message by my proxy is the private IP
address of the client sending the 200 OK, so I don't know why IPtel doesn't use
it in the ACK. I find a lot of information about lost ACKs in posts, but not this
particular issue.
Could anyone give me some related information that can help me to solve this issue?
Best regards,
Ricardo Dominguez
De: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org]
En nombre de Dominguez Jover, Ricardo Enviado el: lunes, 07 de marzo de 2011 20:03
Para: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
Asunto: [SR-Users] ACK not sent and rr-enforced
Hi everybody.
I am using Kamailio 3.1 and RTP proxy for internet calls. I'm using external test
accounts to check if the calls are established and the media flow is ok.
When I use a sip2sip.info or VoIP Talk accounts, then all is working fine between my
internal and these external accounts.
But when I use a
iptel.org account and this account calls to an internal account
(registered with kamailio), then callee sends the 200 OK to the SIP proxy and the SIP
proxy to iptel.
IPtel.org proxy sends the ACK to my proxy with this lines at the end of
the packet:
P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n
P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n
And my SIP proxy never resends the ACK to the callee, so the callee resends OK 200
periodically and after 32 seconds sends a BYE message and the call is finished.
I've been reading posts about missing ACKs but I can't find the answer to my
problem, that it seems like "t_check_trans" doesn´t recognize the ACK as related
to a transaction. But this is only with IPTEL accounts, my proxy SIP is working with other
SIP providers, so I don't know if forcing relay of every ACK packet is a good idea.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Ricardo
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org