jiri,
let us be realistic !!!
the policy (internal - about the code, targets and speed - and external
- regarding contributions and user's wishes) was the key factor that
made for us necessary to fork OpenSER.
having this in mind, I see no fundamentals for your "split-work" idea
(I'm afraid it is just a diversion/advertising thing)... The success of
a piece of code relies on the unity and synchronization of the developers!
so, let us not bore the users from this list....they have better thinks
to learn from it.
regards
bogdan
Jiri Kuthan wrote:
That's been also one of the flamed topics a while
ago when proponents of SER suggested to split the work between openser and
ser contributors so that SER works on the under-the-hood thigns and openser
on the priotirized applications, to aovid contributors doing the same thing
twice. Nevertheless, the interest appeared rather negative.