Hi,
Hope to get some guidance here over the usage of "sips" and "sip plus transport=tls" when following RFC3263.
The RFC3263 says that a NATPR record could return something like this for a query like "host -t NAPTR example.com":
; order pref flags service regexp replacement IN NAPTR 50 50 "s" "SIPS+D2T" "" _sips._tcp.example.com. IN NAPTR 90 50 "s" "SIP+D2T" "" _sip._tcp.example.com IN NAPTR 100 50 "s" "SIP+D2U" "" _sip._udp.example.com.
This means that the client should use sips if possible when contacting example.com.
Concluding from that, I suppose it should perform an SRV lookup "host -t SRV _sips._tcp.example.com", and the result would be:
;; Priority Weight Port Target IN SRV 0 1 5061 server1.example.com IN SRV 0 2 5061 server2.example.com
What I'm curious about is how requests towards one of these servers should look like, and how they are being handled by kamailio.
A lot of clients and servers are sending "sip:user@example.com;transport=tls" in request URIs and Contact headers and Record-Route headers, and you can check with uri_param("transport","tls") which transport socket to use. This is pretty useful as you can determine hop-by-hop whether or not to use TLS. This approach has been obsoleted by RFC3261 though, and there doesn't seem to be a mechanism in RFC3263 to indicate "use schema sip, but use transport=tls".
On encounter of a NAPTR record like the one above, how does kamailio act? Does it set a "sips" schema for the next hop?
And what's the general take on this "sips" schema? As far as I understand RFC3261, it means that if a client sends a request to a sips-URI, the request is sent to the domain via TLS, and from there "the request is sent securely to the callee, but with security mechanisms that depend on the policy of the domain of the callee." (RFC3261, Chapter 4). What does this really mean in practice? Are you allowed to rewrite the schema to "sip" and pass it on for example via UDP to the callee if the callee didn't indicate transport=tls (deprecated anyways) or "sips:" in the Contact of the registration? Or should you keep "sips" as schema, but still send it via UDP, because you know based on local policy or based on client registration that the next hop is not supporting TLS? How would widespread clients react when getting a call to a "sips" URI, especially if they receive it via UDP?
Looking forward hearing your input on that, Andreas