Hello,
didn't get the chance to look at it yet, being out of the office and the
little spare time I got these days I tried to look into libssl/libcrypto
1.1 for the blocking issue reported recently.
I haven't run uac replace with dialog, but as you said, it should not be
an impact of that.
When you run with debug=3, couldn't you spot any hint about what can go
wrong there?
As for a workaround until it gets fixed, try sending 100 trying with sl
module and set the flag for no automatic 100 from tm.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 28.03.19 07:19, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Hello,
did you had a chance to have a quick look? Any sugestions are welcome.
Best regards,
Henning
Am 26. März 2019 08:13:20 MEZ schrieb Henning Westerholt <hw(a)kamailio.org>rg>:
> Am Dienstag, 26. März 2019, 02:27:17 CET schrieb Daniel-Constantin
> Mierla:
>>> I am currently debugging a strange issue related to the usage of
>>> uac_replace_from/to() after msg_apply_changes(). It works all fine,
> but in
>>> a Re-INVITE case it inserts the wrong headers for the 100 - Trying
> case.
>>> The calle
>> did you mean caller or callee? What side is sending the re-INVITE
> with
>> the troubles?
>>
>> Is uac using the record-route param to store the info about From/To?
> Or
>> is via dialog variables?
> Hi Daniel,
>
> storage is with dialog variables, but in the 100 - Trying case this is
> internally done with the uac TM callbacks (If I understood the code
> correctly). If I remove the msg_apply_changes() in the Re-INVITE case,
> all
> works fine.
>
> Call flow (A is a SIP client, B a PSTN destination):
>
> A -> B INVITE, 100, 18x, 200, ACK: all fine
> A -> B first Re-INVITE, 100: the 100 - Trying is broken
> A -> B second Re-INVINTE, 100: the 100 - Trying is broken
> ... more Re-INVINTEs
> A -> B BYE: all fine
>
> I have attached a trace, see below the 100 - Trying examples:
>
> This is ok:
>
> Kamailio-IP.sip > A-SIDE-IP.na-localise: SIP, length: 405
> SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP A-SIDE-IP:
> 5062;rport=5062;branch=z9hG4bKPjh2a4HyDf1ApI7kWK5ShgL7I7w9.LvoeI;received=A-
> SIDE-IP
> From: sip:A-Number@Kamailio-IP;tag=Ho4cXwV4Q-LBW0n4guPOQwvi6GbiylqO
> To: sip:B-Number@Kamailio-IP
> Call-ID: po-DL6LvwksnKK56D3lF8HB4wwo6F.GS
> CSeq: 6764 INVITE
> Server: Carrier-Name SIP Voice Gateway
> Content-Length: 0
>
> This is not OK:
>
> 12:42:59.336930 IP (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 61398, offset 0, flags [none],
> proto
> UDP (17), length 461)
> Kamailio-IP.sip > A-SIDE-IP.na-localise: SIP, length: 433
> SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP A-SIDE-IP:5062;rport=5062;branch=z9hG4bKPj3jfO6Fuk5-
> SJQ2EXOIEeYJk1amH.xKvp;received=A-SIDE-IP
> From: sip:+Rewritten-Number@sip.voice.Carrier-Name.net;tag=Ho4cXwV4Q-
> LBW0n4guPOQwvi6GbiylqO
> To: sip:+B-Number@Carrier-IP:5060;tag=7N2BS4K70tZ9Q
> Call-ID: po-DL6LvwksnKK56D3lF8HB4wwo6F.GS
> CSeq: 6765 INVITE
> Server: Carrier-Name SIP Voice Gateway
> Content-Length: 0
>
> Cheers,
>
> Henning
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 --
www.kamailioworld.com