When you have detected a failed target, you can update the dispatcher table and then reload dispatchers
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 9:57 PM Sergey Safarov s.safarov@gmail.com wrote:
you one dispatcher destination failed you can try other
Example
https://github.com/2600hz/kazoo-configs-kamailio/blob/master/kamailio/dispat...
Think you can find more examples.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 2:49 PM Duarte Rocha duarterocha91@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'll try to better clarify my scenario.
I can't use probing in this situation, as my peer won't allow it.
This is my scenario :
SET: { ID: 102 TARGETS: { DEST: { URI: sip:Peer_IP:5060 FLAGS: AX PRIORITY: 0 ATTRS: { BODY: duid=Peer_01;socket=HA_IP_1:5060 DUID: Peer_01 MAXLOAD: 0 WEIGHT: 0 RWEIGHT: 0 SOCKET: HA_IP_1:5060 SOCKNAME: OBPROXY: } RUNTIME: { DLGLOAD: 0 } } DEST: { URI: sip:Peer_IP:5060 FLAGS: AX PRIORITY: 0 ATTRS: { BODY: duid=Peer_02;socket=HA_IP_2:5060 DUID: Peer_02 MAXLOAD: 0 WEIGHT: 0 RWEIGHT: 0 SOCKET: HA_IP_2:5060 SOCKNAME: OBPROXY: } }
In this case, HA_IP_1 is on this machine and HA_IP_2 is on another machine. When dispatcher with loadbalance is called on this scenario, it fails when choosing Peer_02 as destination.
What i propose is Dispatcher removing Peer_02 from the destination list as long as HA_IP_2 isn't present on that machine. Is this possible?
A segunda, 12/10/2020, 15:34, Duarte Rocha duarterocha91@gmail.com escreveu:
Greetings,
I have two machines with Kamailio in a HA setup with replicated DB. For simplicity let's say each machine has one HA IP and that IP can jump to the other machine in case something happens (kamailio stopping, etc).
I'm using Dispatcher with load balance configuration. I have Dispatcher configured so that each peer has one instance for socket with HA IP 1 and HA IP 2.
In order for this to work correctly on the load balance scenario I must disable via RPC command the peer which has the socket that doesn't belong to the machine. I also must do it every time the IP jumps back and forth, which adds complexety to my system.
Does Dispatcher has any sort of help on this? It could not include peers with sockets IPs that don't belong to the machine in the destination set, for example. Is this possible?
I could also work with failover support but i would rather avoid having so many failovers.
Best Regards,A
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users