26 Feb
2004
26 Feb
'04
3:59 p.m.
Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
On Thursday 26 February 2004 03:28, Arnd Vehling
wrote:
Is it yet possible to build redundancy on top of SRV? I tested some
clients (Xlite, Budgetone-100, Windows Messenger 4.7) wether they use
SRV records to locate the proxy and Messenger is the only one who uses it.
So, if I use these clients, is there any other failover solution than IP
takeover?
regards,
klaus
Next question :) Is there any way that a failover
server pickups the
neccessary port bindings for portaones rtpproxy or do will all
"rtpproxied" sessions fail when a failover server will take over
a primary server?
As currently the rtp-proxy has to run on the same host as SER it does not make
much sence IMHO to think about taking over rtp-proxy sessions. Then you would
need some kind of rtp-proxy session replication, which should be easy when
the nathelper module and the rtp proxy ever uses IP protocol for
communication. But all this will only work if the backup server takes over
the IP of the failed server, and you are not using SRV backup servers for
example (except that a SRV backup can obviously also can takeover the IP).