Re: [Serusers] SER Forward on busy

Greg,

please be kind enough and retry with 8.11 -- developing with 8.10 is for us currently quite counterproductive.

thanks,

-jiri

At 07:03 PM 6/7/2003, Greg Fausak wrote:

I got my hardcoded forwarding working, so I thought I'd createa table and make it real. I created a new table, called onbusy, that is exactly like 'aliases'. I then modified serctl to support it, and inserted a forwardint record.

Then, in my code, I added:

# # forward to location # route[2] { log(1,"IN ROUTE2"); if(method=="INVITE" | method=="BYE" | method=="PRACK") { log(1,"TRACE: addRecordRoute()"); setflag(1); setflag(2); addRecordRoute(); };

     t_on_negative("2");

   if(!t_relay())
   {
           sl_reply_error();
           break;
   };

}

reply_route[2] { log(1,"REPLY_ROUTE:"); revert_uri(); # # check to see if there is a number to forward to # if (!lookup("onbusy")) { t_reply_unsafe("487", "Busy Here?"); break; };

   append_branch();
     t_on_negative("2");

}

However, it doesn't work...I get... Jun 7 10:22:28 rave ser[752]: ERROR: reply cannot be parsed Jun 7 10:22:28 rave ser[752]: on_negative_reply: Error in do_action

Any ideas???

---greg

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/