3 Aug
2004
3 Aug
'04
12:59 p.m.
Thank you Jamie for the great tip! It did work very well :-) The sip gateway dropped the
first 183 for unknown Call-ID. sip gateway didn't send BYE msg back after second 183
msg, call was successfully connected.
SER is really powerful enough that can almost do everything you imagined ^_^
Regards,
----- Original Message -----
From: Jamie Yukes <jyukes(a)gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:00:42 -0400
To: ksabc(a)lycos.com, serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to drop 183 msg
As a total kludge, you may try changing the packet
sufficiently such
that the sip phone will drop it itself...
replace_all( "Call-ID: .*@", "Call-ID: XXX@" );
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 14:46:15 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU
<iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
--
_______________________________________________
Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages
http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.as…
It is not possible to drop a reply from
reply_route - you can change the
reply, but not to drop it entirely.
bogdan
ks lf wrote:
Jamie Yukes
Global Connect http://www.gc1.com/ SIP termination Gateway send two 183 "Session
in Progress" msg back to SER, first one without SDP, second one with SDP ( for remote
ring back tone purpose ), but this crashed the caller party sip phone somehow, how can we
drop the first 183 msg in SER.CFG? We just need forward the second 183 msg to caller
party, but don't forwarding the first one, how to porgram onreply_route part? just use
break sentense doesn't help. Thanks your great help.
Regards,
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers