Hi Pete,
I think you can try with latest nightly build. Daniel has committed fix at 08 March late evening. So I think it included in latest nightly build.
-- Best regards, Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov@gmail.com
2017-05-08 16:37 GMT+03:00 Sergey Basov sergey.v.basov@gmail.com:
Hi.
No. Daniel does not merged fix yet. And he needs some time to backport it to 5.0 branch
-- WBR Sergey Basov
8 мая 2017 г. 4:34 PM пользователь "Pete Kelly" pkelly@gmail.com написал:
Is this fix in the nightly .deb build?
I've just tested the latest and it's still broken
On 8 May 2017 at 07:50, Sergey Basov sergey.v.basov@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Daniel.
I have created pool request
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1124
Best regards, Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov@gmail.com
2017-05-08 8:44 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com:
Try to make a pull request for it and if all ok it will be merged.
Cheers, Daniel
On 06.05.17 17:20, Sergey Basov wrote:
I found issue cause.
After I have changed line 792 of the file tps_msg.c from if(tps_reappend_route(msg, &stsd, &stsd.b_rr, 0)<0) {
to if(tps_reappend_route(msg, &stsd, &stsd.b_rr, 1)<0) {
now route header are restores in from:
Route: <sip:10.56.42.37:5070;lr;ftag=EN0cvoXXCOgdGoO2zizq-WNmE4Enf4
Nt;did=434.5ce1;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9 OjUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAgE AAgcAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA>
Route: sip:KITS1.MSS.LIFE.COM:5060;transport=UDP;lr
Now ACK are routed correctly.
Seems that earlier, before fix b_rr store into DB, we does not see this issue, because only last route header was saved... But after fix, we have all route records so we nned to restore it into wright way.
Now I have worked scheme with 3 kamailio in a row, on first of them enabled topos on other only topoh module.
Daniel, I will send to you latest dump in separate e-mail.
Thank you.
-- Best regards, Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov@gmail.com
2017-05-05 23:16 GMT+03:00 Sergey Basov sergey.v.basov@gmail.com:
I think it is because wrong order of Route: header after restoring...
With topoh enabled I have:
Route: <sip:10.56.42.37:5070;lr;ftag=IpXq-LwNvJF6WrkOcmZNf9WjmGjK5d
Uv;did=90c.1132;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9 OjUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAgE AAgcAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA>
Route: sip:KITS1.MSS.LIFE.COM:5060;transport=UDP;lr
But with topos enabled I have:
Route: sip:KITS1.MSS.LIFE.COM:5060;transport=UDP;lr,<sip:10.56.42
.37:5070;lr;ftag=EN0cvoXXCOgdGoO2zizq-WNmE4Enf4Nt;did=434.5c e1;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9OjUwNjA7dXNlc j1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAgEAAgcAAAABAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA>
And kamailio trying to send ACK to KITS1.MSS.LIFE.COM:5060
Can you fix it? Or I going in to wrong directuon?
Thank you.
Best regards, Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov@gmail.com
2017-05-05 20:32 GMT+03:00 Sergey Basov sergey.v.basov@gmail.com: > Hi Daniel > > Semms now we have ankther problem... > > b_rr weites in db correctly. > But when ack is sending from A side it try to send to B side to
cantact ip,
> ignoring record-route headers... > > I will try to debug this. > > If you have any idea I can test it. > > Thank you. > > -- > WBR > Sergey Basov > > 28 апр. 2017 г. 7:25 PM пользователь "Sergey Basov" > sergey.v.basov@gmail.com написал: > >> Hi Daniel. >> >> Seems all is ok now. >> >> I applyed your patch and add my additional debug string. >> >> Now result is: >> >> Apr 28 19:15:52 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[14177]: DEBUG: topos >> [tps_msg.c:464]: tps_pack_message(): sbasov compacted headers -
b_rr:
>> >> [<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEkMcFYXzjDMqpsSozWseXDMGxppCqzh1E
k2ZS1uoLBVfSPhqYZXlvyga*>](84)
>> >> Apr 28 19:15:52 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[14177]: DEBUG: topos >> [tps_msg.c:464]: tps_pack_message(): sbasov compacted headers -
b_rr:
>> >> [<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEkMcFYXzjDMqpsSozWseXDMGxppCqzh1E
k2ZS1uoLBVfSPhqYZXlvyga*>,sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEk.dED. sRD.TSD.z2k.sEGLlvygavebZAeLqVDJ7cZRoXPrXUYbGjQdPrTMqbYddReR XWQs9xWXFYupcMQuTfehTjD.lRkhavPbGJxsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTs XnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsdvPbG7xsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTs XnTsXnTsXnTsXne7YnTuP.TsXnTsFnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXn](349)
>> >> Apr 28 19:15:52 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[14177]: DEBUG: topos >> [tps_msg.c:464]: tps_pack_message(): sbasov compacted headers -
b_rr:
>> >> [<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEkMcFYXzjDMqpsSozWseXDMGxppCqzh1E
k2ZS1uoLBVfSPhqYZXlvyga*>,sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEk.dED. sRD.TSD.z2k.sEGLlvygavebZAeLqVDJ7cZRoXPrXUYbGjQdPrTMqbYddReR XWQs9xWXFYupcMQuTfehTjD.lRkhavPbGJxsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTs XnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsdvPbG7xsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTs XnTsXnTsXnTsXne7YnTuP.TsXnTsFnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXn,sip:10. 56.42.33:5090;lr;ftag=F.m-GnEuqBVsqhGWBMgTA6gaRiJOHRUY; did=d41.3811;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9OjU wNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA QAAAAOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA](556)
>> >> Apr 28 19:15:52 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[14177]: DEBUG: topos >> [tps_msg.c:482]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - a_rr:
[](0) -
>> b_rr: >> [<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEkMcFYXzjDMqpsSozWseXDMGxppCqzh1E
k2ZS1uoLBVfSPhqYZXlvyga*>,sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEk.dED. sRD.TSD.z2k.sEGLlvygavebZAeLqVDJ7cZRoXPrXUYbGjQdPrTMqbYddReR XWQs9xWXFYupcMQuTfehTjD.lRkhavPbGJxsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTs XnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsdvPbG7xsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTs XnTsXnTsXnTsXne7YnTuP.TsXnTsFnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXn,sip:10. 56.42.33:5090;lr;ftag=F.m-GnEuqBVsqhGWBMgTA6gaRiJOHRUY; did=d41.3811;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9OjU wNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA QAAAAOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA](556)
>> - s_rr: [](0) >> >> >> Seems this issue is solved. >> >> Can you apply this patch to 5.0 branch? >> Then may be Pete Kelly will install nightly build of the 5.0.1 and >> confirm that issu is solved. >> >> I does not have such count of sbc for test ) >> >> Thank you Daniel. >> -- >> Best regards, >> Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov@gmail.com >> >> >> 2017-04-28 17:14 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
miconda@gmail.com>:
>>> Hello, >>> >>> many thanks Sergey for troubleshooting, it saved a lot of time! >>> Hopefully I caught the issue. Can you test with latest master
branch and
>>> let me know if works? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel >>> >>> >>> On 28.04.17 14:57, Sergey Basov wrote: >>>> Some more debug >>>> >>>> after adding debug output after each iteration I got: >>>> >>>> Apr 28 15:51:51 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[13743]: DEBUG: topos >>>> [tps_msg.c:457]: tps_pack_message(): sbasov compacted headers -
b_rr:
>>>> >>>> [<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEkMcFYXzjDMqpsSozWseXDMGxppCqzh1E
k2ZS1uoLBVfSPhqYZXlvyga*>](84)
>>>> Apr 28 15:51:51 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[13743]: DEBUG: topos >>>> [tps_msg.c:457]: tps_pack_message(): sbasov compacted headers -
b_rr:
>>>> >>>> [<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEk.dED.sRD.TSD.z2k.sEGLlvygavebZA
eLq9pRZROhZq1.F9BJfpywe1pMz7PLB8GdeF1RFST377QpcMQuTfepwJDJZ. zhdvPbGJxsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXn TsdvPbG7xsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXne7YnTuP.TsXn TsFnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXn>](348)
>>>> Apr 28 15:51:51 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[13743]: DEBUG: topos >>>> [tps_msg.c:457]: tps_pack_message(): sbasov compacted headers -
b_rr:
>>>> >>>> [<sip:10.56.42.33:5090;lr;ftag=iOdvx4ub2iroSnVXNC4w784FIcbrB
-4i;did=e9f.5f22;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h 9OjUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAQAAAAOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA>](554)
>>>> >>>> Apr 28 15:51:51 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[13743]: DEBUG: topos >>>> [tps_msg.c:475]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - a_rr:
[](0) -
>>>> b_rr: >>>> [<sip:10.56.42.33:5090;lr;ftag=iOdvx4ub2iroSnVXNC4w784FIcbrB
-4i;did=e9f.5f22;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h 9OjUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAQAAAAOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA>](554)
>>>> - s_rr: [](0) >>>> >>>> So size are computed correctly, but part of record-routes >>>> disappears.... And we can see correct size of the record but
only last
>>>> part of the record-routes >>>> >>>> Hope it helps >>>> -- >>>> Best regards, >>>> Sergey Basov e-mail:
sergey.v.basov@gmail.com
>>>> >>>> >>>> 2017-04-28 15:37 GMT+03:00 Sergey Basov <
sergey.v.basov@gmail.com>:
>>>>> One more detail >>>>> >>>>> When debug=3 I see in logs (look at size of record and it
contents)
>>>>> >>>>> Apr 28 14:16:44 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[13287]: DEBUG: topos >>>>> [tps_msg.c:473]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - a_rr:
[](0) -
>>>>> b_rr: [](0) - s_rr: >>>>> >>>>> [<sip:10.56.42.33;r2=on;lr;ftag=ed1qg.1TlqHP7frDwZWwhcyKAcOf
IVTn;did=a4b.fc01;vsf=AAAAAAoLAQ4DAA4DAHlnYg5heGJnG3Rnd3MebX 14CTUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAMOAwEABwcEAwd3AnBlfGJ9B RxjYGAUeXl/dRU2PChyPXBob25l;nat=yes>,sip:212.58.160.253: 5061;transport=tls;r2=on;lr;ftag=ed1qg.1TlqHP7frDwZWwhcyKAcOfIVTn; did=a4b.fc01;vsf=AAAAAAoLAQ4DAA4DAHlnYg5heGJnG3Rnd3MebX14CTU wNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAMOAwEABwcEAwd3AnBlfGJ9BRxjYG AUeXl/dRU2PChyPXBob25l;nat=yes](453)
>>>>> >>>>> 453 - is a real size of shown header >>>>> >>>>> s_rr parses normal, but b_rr >>>>> >>>>> Apr 28 14:16:48 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[13273]: DEBUG: topos >>>>> [tps_msg.c:473]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - a_rr:
[](0) -
>>>>> b_rr: >>>>> [<sip:10.56.42.33:5090;lr;ftag=ed1qg.1TlqHP7frDwZWwhcyKAcOfI
VTn;did=a4b.6ec;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9 OjUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAQAAAAOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA>](553)
>>>>> - s_rr: [](0) >>>>> >>>>> 553 - seems a real correct size of the recordroute header and it >>>>> differs from size with \0 at the end >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Sergey Basov e-mail:
sergey.v.basov@gmail.com
>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2017-04-28 14:46 GMT+03:00 Sergey Basov <
sergey.v.basov@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> Hi All. >>>>>> >>>>>> I just try to pass call throught 3 kamailio. >>>>>> I got result like yours >>>>>> >>>>>> If you need testers for patch - I am ready ) >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Sergey Basov e-mail:
sergey.v.basov@gmail.com
>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2017-04-28 12:57 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>>>>> miconda@gmail.com: >>>>>>> There seems to be an issue saving the record-route list for
b-side
>>>>>>> in >>>>>>> topos_d table -- first two are saved but then there are only 0 >>>>>>> characters >>>>>>> instead of the rest of record routes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> '<sip:192.168.252.75;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=A1;did=072.87c;rtpi=1;
nat=no;rtpi=1>\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0 \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0 \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0 \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0 \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0 \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0'
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will have to dig a bit into the code. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, Daniel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 27.04.17 14:30, Pete Kelly wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes no problem. I wanted to come but the life schedule would
not
>>>>>>> allow it >>>>>>> this time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 27 April 2017 at 13:11, Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>>>>>> miconda@gmail.com >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> time, I need more time :-) ... with Kamailio World Conference >>>>>>>> around the >>>>>>>> corner, I am caught in a lot of admin tasks... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 27.04.17 13:11, Pete Kelly wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Daniel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there anything else you need on this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 26 April 2017 at 15:06, Pete Kelly pkelly@gmail.com
wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Daniel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's CSeq 1, fromtag A1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> DB attached >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 26 April 2017 at 15:03, Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>>>>>>>> miconda@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Can you paste here the from tag or cseq for the dialog you
are
>>>>>>>>>> referring >>>>>>>>>> to? Because the number of frames are not matching my pcap
viewer.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Send also the db dump, they should reveal if something is
broken
>>>>>>>>>> there. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 26.04.17 14:46, Pete Kelly wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ah I see why it is confusing >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This setup maintains a Call-ID through an SBC downstream,
so the
>>>>>>>>>> INVITE's you see have the same Call-ID but they have a
different
>>>>>>>>>> fromtag/cseq, Wireshark shows them all as one call which is >>>>>>>>>> annoying when >>>>>>>>>> looking at the viewer! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you check the first call only between 252.70 and 252.75
you
>>>>>>>>>> will see >>>>>>>>>> INVITE (frame 4), 200OK (frame 16) with lots of RR headers. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The ACK generated by topos (frame 21) only contains 1 Route >>>>>>>>>> header, it >>>>>>>>>> should contain more so the request can hop through the
proxy
>>>>>>>>>> chain as shown >>>>>>>>>> in frame 16. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I see the example from Sergey is working, but there is
only 1 RR
>>>>>>>>>> header >>>>>>>>>> in this example - as you can see from my example the topos
module
>>>>>>>>>> uses the >>>>>>>>>> first RR header but ignores the other 5. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have the DB dump and logfiles from this call too if
useful.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Pete >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 26 April 2017 at 12:41, Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>>>>>>>>> miconda@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> As I could notice upon a quick look, there seems to be
two calls
>>>>>>>>>>> -- two >>>>>>>>>>> INVITE requests having same call id but different cseq.
Can you
>>>>>>>>>>> confirm >>>>>>>>>>> this is the case? Because the capture doesn't seem to
have all
>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> incoming/outgoing messages, some are missing. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 26.04.17 12:59, Sergey Basov wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> You give to us very hard callflow... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Without any pauses between responces.. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Some requests go through 127.0.0.1... But responces from >>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1 >>>>>>>>>>>> not present. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There are peers from which invites not present in dump.
I can
>>>>>>>>>>>> not see >>>>>>>>>>>> ful path of the initial Invite, but there is responses. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I will send dump in next email directly. >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Basov e-mail: >>>>>>>>>>>> sergey.v.basov@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-04-26 11:01 GMT+03:00 Pete Kelly <pkelly@gmail.com
:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attached is the pcap from latest nightly. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> As you can see (frame 21) the ACK is incorrect, I
believe it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>> specify >>>>>>>>>>>>> all the hops from the 200OK (frame 16) so that the hop
by hop
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ACK >>>>>>>>>>>>> can be >>>>>>>>>>>>> routed via the proxy chain. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> topoh module works fine. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pete >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26 April 2017 at 05:18, Sergey Basov >>>>>>>>>>>>> sergey.v.basov@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I dont know how nightly builds are done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just try with latest 5.0.1 nightly and send new dump. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I understud topos module done to remove record-route >>>>>>>>>>>>>> headers to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hide >>>>>>>>>>>>>> topology... Am I wright, Daniel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And try to disable topos module and enable topoh
module. Will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all work >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you expecrs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Basov >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 25 апр. 2017 г. 11:31 PM пользователь "Pete Kelly" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pkelly@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have tried with 5.0.1 from today (25th April). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying build for 26th will have some fixes? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 April 2017 at 18:59, Sergey Basov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sergey.v.basov@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actualy latest fixes to 180/183/200, ACK and memory
leak
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pushed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5.0 and master branch. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, please try with latest 5.0.1 nightly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Basov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 25 апр. 2017 г. 8:55 PM пользователь "Pete Kelly" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pkelly@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Call is with sipp but first goes through another
SBC to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clean up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SIP (in case of problems with sipp via headers etc). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The traces I've done are actually with 4.4. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will they be OK or would you prefer 5.0.1? The
problem is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same on both. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 April 2017 at 16:25, Sergey Basov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sergey.v.basov@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you send dump of the call with kamailio 5.0.1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nightly? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And does you make call using sipp? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Basov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 25 апр. 2017 г. 5:57 PM пользователь "Pete Kelly" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pkelly@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like from last night: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5.0.1+0~20170425013247.36+trusty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 April 2017 at 15:42, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> miconda@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be sure, it is 5.0.1 build from last night or
quite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recent? There >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were some fixes in the past days to topos module. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25.04.17 15:59, Pete Kelly wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Daniel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delayed response to this, the ACK
is for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 200OK yes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the problem still persists in latest 4.4 and
the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5.0.1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nightly build. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have all DB entries/kam logs/pcap files. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you check the attached pcap, 192.168.70.70 and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.252.70 are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same instance of Kamailio, it is being used
to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bridge the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 networks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Frame 34 shows the 200OK with lots of
Record-Route etc,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frame 35 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shows topos in action. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However the ACK that is relayed in Frame 38
seems to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Route information that was supplied in the
200OK,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes the ACK to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be relayed directly to the Contact, breaking the
proxy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chain. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pete >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22 February 2017 at 18:31, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> miconda@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the ACK for 200ok? Or an ack for a negative >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you get a pcap for such situation with all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the call? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/02/2017 17:20, Pete Kelly wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using the topos module when bridging 2
networks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The INVITE/200OK part of the transaction is
working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (i.e. the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact on both sides matches correctly the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corresponding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> network). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However when the ACK is sent into Kamailio,
instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> realising >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the next hop is myself and skipping it,
Kamailio is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sending >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ACK directly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to itself as a packet, causing the call setup to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have any advice for this situation? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cg
i-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 6-8 (Europe)
and Mar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20-22 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (USA) - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.asipto.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.kamailioworld.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.asipto.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.kamailioworld.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi
-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>>>>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) -
www.asipto.com
>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - >>>>>>>>>>> www.kamailioworld.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>>>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) -
www.asipto.com
>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - >>>>>>>>>> www.kamailioworld.com >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) -
www.asipto.com
>>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 -
www.kamailioworld.com
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com >>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 -
www.kamailioworld.com
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>>>>> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org >>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>>>>> >>> -- >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>> Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com >>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 -
www.kamailioworld.com
>>>
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com