sr-users-request@lists.sip-router.org wrote:
Send sr-users mailing list submissions to sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to sr-users-request@lists.sip-router.org
You can reach the person managing the list at sr-users-owner@lists.sip-router.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Aliases Using the Default Script; (David J.)
- Re: Green VoIP - energy efficiency and performances of v3.0 (Jan Janak)
- Kamailio v3.1.4 Released (Daniel-Constantin Mierla)
- Re: ser_ctl / serweb (caio)
- Re: [OT] IETF SIMPLE WG will destroy MSRP with the new draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11 (I?aki Baz Castillo)
- Re: [OT] IETF SIMPLE WG will destroy MSRP with the new draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11 (Daniel-Constantin Mierla)
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 14:27:55 -0400 From: "David J." david@styleflare.com Subject: [SR-Users] Aliases Using the Default Script; To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List" sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Message-ID: 4DDE9BAB.4060401@styleflare.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I am using the kamailio default script on 3.1.3.
I was wondering what happens when I added an Alias in dbaliases?
For example if I add 18005551212@mydomain.com alias to 1001@mydomain.com
when an invite comes in; it works perfect I got a 200 back. (1001 Device rings.)
If I add another alias to a remote server; ie.
18005551213@mydomain.com alias to 1800555124@someotherdomain.com
I get a 404 back.
I wonder what happens internally?
What should I modify to enable this case;
Thanks.
Message: 2 Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 20:49:39 +0200 From: Jan Janak jan@ryngle.com Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Green VoIP - energy efficiency and performances of v3.0 To: miconda@gmail.com Cc: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER)
- Users Mailing List" sr-users@lists.sip-router.org, sr-dev
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org Message-ID: BANLkTikUb_iwBDEuqk977-ECmmHo4dEXvQ@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
No, I turned it off.
-Jan
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:50, Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
out of curiosity, since you used the sources from GIT - was memory debugging on? It is usually enabled in master branch and that could have some impact in memory usage and performances...
Thanks, Daniel
On 5/25/11 3:00 PM, Jan Janak wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 06:54, Jeremyajeremy@electrosilk.net ?wrote:
These figures pale into insignificance compared to the power required for standard SIP devices - typically 5-8 watts per device multiplied by the number of devices.
When you factor in Gigabit Ethernet the power ups significantly.
Optimisation at the server level is not significant on any scale. Optimisation on communications power: i.e. end-devices, DSL& ?switches is where the power savings are important.
Sure, the total power consumption of the whole system is dominated by the power consumption of end-point devices, there's no doubt about that and the paper says that.
Nevertheless, as an ITSP you are typically paying for the energy consumed by your servers and in that case knowing what you can expect and how many servers you need is useful. Modern data-center servers have significant base-line power consumption and a portion of that needs to be attributed to the SIP service running on those servers.
-Jan
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
Jan Janak conducted a very interesting research project regarding energy efficiency of VoIP systems during 2010, a collaboration between iptel.org and Columbia University.
The team used the source code from sip-router.org GIT repository from January 2010, which corresponds to Kamailio (former OpenSER) and SER v3.0. The latest stable series v3.1 shares the same internal architecture with v3.0.
As part of the research work, Jan could also gather some figures about capacity and performances of v3.0 with a quite complex configuration file: etc/sip-router-oob.cfg (involving authentication and NAT traversal as well).
You can read the paper about energy efficiency at:
- Green VoIP Article: http://asipto.com/u/2j
The draft notes about capacity and performances of v3.0 are available at:
- Performances and Capacity for v3.0 Wiki page: http://asipto.com/u/2k
Some interesting results:
- one instance of SIP server with 500 000 online users (mixed users ?
behind and not NAT routers) ? consumed energy 210W
- one instance of SIP server with 1 000 000 online users (no NAT
involved) ? consumed energy 190W
- on a 32-bit machine with 4GB of memory and with 2.5GB reserved for
SIP server, the server could support 43 000 simultaneous TLS connections ? consumed energy 203W
- one SIP server instance with 80 000 permanent TCP connections, the
SIP server could still handle at least 1000 requests per second and a connection arrival rate of 1000 new connections per second, done for 20 000 new connections. CPU load generated by the SIP server was from 6% to 8%.
I added a new section to the draft notes to list the enhancements done for the latest stable release (v3.1.x) that contribute to performance improvements, like asynchronous TLS, fine tuning of memory for TLS connections and raw UDP sockets.
Cheers, Daniel
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com
Message: 3 Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 21:00:42 +0200 From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio v3.1.4 Released To: kamailio sr-users@lists.sip-router.org, sr-dev sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org, business@lists.kamailio.org Message-ID: 4DDEA35A.7070606@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hello,
Kamailio SIP Server v3.1.4 stable release is out.
This is a maintenance release of latest stable branch, 3.1, that includes fixes since release of v3.1.3. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure. Deployments running previous v3.1.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v3.1.4.
For more details about version 3.1.4, visit:
http://www.kamailio.org/w/2011/05/kamailio-v3-1-4-released/
Cheers, Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
Message: 4 Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:59:42 -0300 From: caio elcaio@gmail.com Subject: Re: [SR-Users] ser_ctl / serweb To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List" sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Message-ID: BANLkTik+dnTp-egK2xy1ua=tPnCcaDuuOA@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello,
Anyone know if ser_ctl (python utility) will be merged into master? Or is going to be deprecated? If it still alive, are there any examples/docs of the usage for DB users provisoining? kamctl and kamdbctl are recomended for its substitution?
Which utility will be official for sip-router? Sorry if it already were discussed, but I didn't find comments about it since 2010.
Thank you Claudio
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Claudio Furrer elcaio@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Just want to ask if ser_ctl application will be merged into sr3.1 or future releases. By the moment I've found it here [1], [2] or [3].
Is it full compatible with sip-router v3.x?
I know kamctl and kamdbctl would be suggested but these are for kamailio flavour. I don't find too much work based on SER flavour regarding to database/users administration and web provisioning. BTW, siremis only works with kamailio db structures, but for sip-router v3 ser-flavoured only found serweb 2.x here [4] and [5] which I don't know if is it working well with the current new releases of the project.
I would appreciate if someone can advice me if kamailio is the way to go, because have find that sip-router or ser flavours miss some docs and apps that kamailio already have.
I'm asking from a a SER-user point of view, who want to migrate to SR-3 :(
[1] http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/serctl/daily-snapshots/ [2]
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=ser;a=tree;f=ser_ctl;h=7db4a0... [3] http://cvs.berlios.de/viewvc/ser/serctl/
[4] http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/serweb/daily-snapshots/ [5] http://developer.berlios.de/projects/serweb/
Thank you, Claudio