SER does not generate such an error, SEMS does. Possibly,
your BYEs are mistakenly passed to SEMS. They are supposed
to be processed by loose routing.
-jiri
At 08:33 PM 12/18/2003, Darren Sessions wrote:
Situation:
Endpoint is called Party (Sipura SPA2000)
Calling Party is routed through from a TDM call and VoIP'd by Cisco 3640
router then sent to SER.
Endpoint receives call - everything works. When the Sipura hangs up the
call, it sends a BYE to ser - but ser does not send the BYE to the router to
disconnect the TDM channel.
All other situations result in a completed call with channels released on
the router just fine.
After further inspection - we noticed that when the Sipura hangs up and send
the BYE to SER, SER responds with this:
SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 11.11.111.155:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-b76fe29f
From: <sip:8646783182@22.22.222.154>;tag=bc5a80577e3d5642
To: <sip:8644679887@33.33.333.157>;tag=322BCA98-25A3
Call-ID: F429FDCE-30B011D8-BA0EDB9C-52307829(a)33.33.333.157
CSeq: 101 BYE
Contact: <sip:8644679887@44.44.444.148>
Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.12 (i386/linux))
Content-Length: 0
Warning: 392 44.44.444.148:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=20033
req_src_ip=22.22.222.154 req_src_port=5060
in_uri=sip:8644679887@44.44.444.148:5060
out_uri=sip:8644679887@44.44.444.148:5060 via_cnt==0"
Any ideas?
Thanks,
- Darren
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan
http://iptel.org/~jiri/