22 Jun
2005
22 Jun
'05
12:47 p.m.
Hello,
I've found and estrange behaviour in the 'append_to_reply' action when used
in conjunction with 'save' action during REGISTER processing.
In particular, if I use in ser.cfg:
...
append_to_reply("Service-Route:
<sip:orig@scscf.domain1.com;lr>\r\n");
save("domain1");
...
Then the Service-Route header is added to the "200 OK". But if changing the
relative order of the actions:
...
save("domain1");
append_to_reply("Service-Route:
<sip:orig@scscf.domain1.com;lr>\r\n");
...
Then the 'append_to_reply' is ignored: no header is added to the response.
I think is a weird behaviour... I would like to know if this is a bug or a
feature (I have read the textops documentation at
http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/modules/html/textops.html#AEN104 and nothing
about problems with 'save' are mentioned).
Thank you in advance!
Best regards,
------
Fermín
Agora Systems, S. A.