1 Dec
2005
1 Dec
'05
12:39 p.m.
Hi Matteo,
unfortunately I do not have since I'm not using LCR module. Maybe others
on the list may provide you with a sample.
regards,
bogdan
Matteo Piazza wrote:
Hi,
yuo can me send an example of a LCR DAtabase compiled
Thank's
| prefix | from_uri | grp_id | pryority |
-----------------------------------------
| ? | ? | ? | ? |
| ? | ? | ? | ? |
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Tim,
Tim Klein wrote:
Bogdan said:
according to RFC and Q interpretation, you will get in request route
the C and D contacts (as they have the lower q (higher priority) and
their q is equal. In failure route you get A and B (as they have the
same q).
regards,
bogdan
I just committed serial proper forking support
into core - it was
migrated from LCR module. I mean proper, since it has q value
support and it can be used by any module without any inter-module
dependencies.
The idea behind was to allow to all module that performs parallel
forking to do also serial forking - exec, enum, registrar, etc.
That's good news! Thank you!
But I have some questions to help me understand the new functions.
Please see below...
There are two new script functions :
*serialize_branches(n)* : it inherits the functionality of
load_contacts() from LCR; gets all parallel branches and convert
them into AVPs for serial forking; numerical parameter 'n' says if
any previous AVP should be removed (if non-0) or not (if 0).
Returns true is no error (even if no serialization happened).
*next_branches()* : it inherits the functionality of
next_contacts() from LCR; get (based on q value) the next
contact(s) to be used in sequential forking. Returns true only if
a new contact was got to be used.
The AVP containing the branches is accessible only via alias - its
ID is not configurable or visible; the alias (automatically
exported by core) is "serial_branch" - it is visible from any
module that uses the avp core aliasing system.
My questions:
Let's say there are 4 contacts registered. Two of the contacts ("A"
and "B") have q value of 1.0. The other two contacts ("C" and
"D")
have q value of 0.5.
Using the following routing script, which contacts will be tried in
the main route block, and which will be tried in the failure_route
block?
modparam("registrar",
"append_branches", 1)
.....
{
.....
lookup("location");
serialize_branches(1);
t_on_failure("1");
t_relay();
}
failure_route[1] {
if (next_branches()) {
t_relay();
}
}
Thank you!
Tim
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users