Re: [Serusers] loose_route() function doesn't work? - ser 2_0_0

Hi, I have the following SIP scenario: UA_A -> SER_A -> other SIP Proxy -> SER_A -> UA_B I want to force SER_A instance to forward the received request to other SIP proxy element and ensure that that request will return to SER_A afterwards. To do that I use an insert_hf() function from textops module inside ser.cfg to insert a double Route header field - first value the sip uri of the 'other SIP proxy' and second one the SER_A sip uri to assure that the forwarded request will return to SER_A. Whenever request enters the ser.cfg script logic my SER code performs the loose_route() check in general. In my situation when request initialy enters the logic it doesn't have any Route headers. When request enters a particular route block responsible for handling this request there is an lookup_user() invocation to check if the user should be serviced by this SER. If lookup_user() returns true and this particular user has a flag set which indicates routing through the extra SIP proxy I add the Route headers and pass the request to the 'FORWARD' route block where I do the t_relay(). My problem is that when I do t_relay() after inserting the Route headers into the request it is not forwarded according to the topmost Route header field value?? Is it bug in ser?? Please point me what do I missed. Thank you in advance. Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers