15 Mar
2008
15 Mar
'08
1:07 p.m.
Hi Inaki,
I have already read it but probably missed this important detail.
Thanks for the advice. I will read it again more carefully.
Best regards,
Shie
Quoting Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>et>:
El Sábado, 15 de Marzo de 2008, shiebar(a)post.tau.ac.il
escribió:
Hi Inaki,
Then what should I do if I get the following error:
SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist
When both caller and callee are online?
And why do you assume that it's a fail related to the "To" header?
RFC 3261
21.4.19 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist
This status indicates that the UAS received a request that does not
match any existing dialog or transaction.
Also read how a UA tries to match an incoming request to an existing
transaction:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-17.2.3
WeSIP receive the request with the real From uri
but the To uri
contains the IP of openser server.
Is this the correct situation?
Sincerely, you should read the RFC 3261 to understand that the "To" header is
usually not examinated by the UAS, just the Request-Uri. But you cannot
asumme something incorrect without reading about it and later ask "then
what?".
;)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users