On 4/9/10 9:11 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 09.04.2010 20:29, schrieb Juha Heinanen:
Vikram Ragukumar writes:
Why is the SDP connection parameter not being rewritten for the 180 Ringing message alone ?
are you sure that you are calling a function, such as use_media_proxy() or corresponding rtpproxy function, on the ringing reply? does both ringing and session progress contain a sdp body?
How can i ensure the SIP messages are relayed in the order they are received ?
someone who is familiar with tm/core needs to reply to this one. there may not be any guarantee, because the replies are processed by different processes.
I think the only solution would be to use single processes: children=1, tcp_children=1.
This is right. However, this is not only related to sip server itself, the messages can arrive in a different order when using UDP because of network. Handling it in server is not a complete solution. The phones should be able to deal with such cases.
Cheers, Daniel