28 Mar
2007
28 Mar
'07
10:30 p.m.
On Mar 28, 2007 at 19:34, Jiri Kuthan <jiri(a)iptel.org> wrote:
Steve,
I think it is fair to consider Ottendorf finished. The only important reason (apart from
better documentation)
for not having declared Ottendorf to be "officially" released is we are
conservatively awaiting feedback from
some friendly bigger sites which have deployed it. Happily, we have not received
complaints so far. I think
it will take four more weeks for us to collect critical amount of feedback to feel
comfortable declaring
the release as "officialy final". For those who are not running 100k subsribers
on a box and are not patient
enough to wait for more documentation, I can only recommend to go ahead now.
-jiri
I would add that the missing parts are:
- documentation update
- ser libraries building fixes: the libraries fail to build on several
systems (but they build ok on linux and I think on BSDs too). This
matters only if you use presence related modules (dialog, pa, rls,
presence_b2b, xcap).
- a check to see if all the fixes that made it into unstable after we
branched 2.0 were backported (I think some tls stuff might still be
missing).
Andrei
At 13:03 27/03/2007, Steve Blair wrote:
Would someone be able to tell me the status of
the Ottendorf release? In addition to knowing when the stable release will be available I
am also interested in when presence support will be available.
Thanks,Steve
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers