On 03.11.20 11:10, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
set_reply_close() is very minimal wrapper action from the core setting an internal flag. It can be merged with a reply function, but maybe it should be a new function a little bit more generic, like send_reply_mode(code, reason, mode) where mode is a parameter that can be used for other purposes in the future (by using bit-based flags).
There may be cases where it is not good idea to close connection after reply. So it should not be automatically done by send_reply().
Maybe my phrasing was confusing, I didn't want to suggest to be included in existing sl reply functions.
I wanted to say that the new function to be added should be a bit more generic, not targeting only set_reply_close()+send_reply(), but have a "mode" parameter to control what other operations should be done before sending the reply out.
Cheers, Daniel
A new function either with or without an extra argument would be fine.
-- Juha