Hi Marrold. I want to authenticate user on Kamailio but want Asterisk to see them registered with kamailio ip as contact.
I making also some manipulations in $fu as users are different (emp_xxx_ext) in kamailio than in Asterisk xxx_ext
Thanks
2016-03-31 10:48 GMT+02:00 Marrold kamailio@marrold.co.uk:
Why not just relay the registration messages to Asterisk itself? What's the use case?
Cheers
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Alberto Sagredo < alberto.sagredo@avanzada7.com> wrote:
Hi
Im trying to modify example for Asterisk/Kamailio integration that miconda did, and trying to handle Forwarded register to Asterisk in an authenticated way instead removing secret in asterisk.
I have made this changes
route[REGFWD] {
if(!is_method("REGISTER")) { return; } $var(rip) = $var(astip); $uac_req(method)="REGISTER"; $uac_req(ruri)="sip:" + $var(rip) + ":" + $var(astport); $uac_req(furi)="sip:" + $(au{s.substr,8,0}) + "@" + $var(rip); $uac_req(turi)="sip:" + $(au{s.substr,8,0}) + "@" + $var(rip); $uac_req(hdrs)="Contact: <sip:" + $au + "@" + $sel(cfg_get.kamailio.bindip) + ":" + $sel(cfg_get.kamailio.bindport) +">\r\n";
if($sel(contact.expires) != $null) $uac_req(hdrs)= $uac_req(hdrs) + "Expires: " +$sel(contact.expires) + "\r\n";
else $uac_req(hdrs)= $uac_req(hdrs) + "Expires: " +$hdr(Expires) + "\r\n";
xlog("Dentro de REGFWD"); t_on_failure("REG_AST"); uac_req_send();}
failure_route[REG_AST] {
if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } xlog("Dentro de REG AST"); if(t_check_status("401|407")) { xlog("Dentro de 401"); $avp(auser) = "test"; $avp(apass) = "test"; uac_auth(); t_relay(); exit; }}
What i see on traces:
U x.x.x..240:5060 -> x.x.x..56:5060
REGISTER sip:x.x.x.56:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.240;branch=z9hG4bKfb46.a47535d4000000000000000000000000.0.
To: sip:200@x.x.x.56.
From: sip:200@x.x.x.56;tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-6a4f.
CSeq: 10 REGISTER.
Call-ID: 09dc120d65932ed7-16044@127.0.0.1.
Max-Forwards: 70.
Content-Length: 0.
User-Agent: ANY.
Contact: sip:emp_001_200@x.x.x.240:5060.
Expires: 3600.
.
#
U x.x.x.56:5060 -> x.x.x..240:5060
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x..240 ;branch=z9hG4bKfb46.a47535d4000000000000000000000000.0;received= x.x.x..240;rport=5060.
From: sip:200@x.x.x.56;tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-6a4f.
To: sip:200@x.x.x.56;tag=as62b47138.
Call-ID: 09dc120d65932ed7-16044@127.0.0.1.
CSeq: 10 REGISTER.
Server: FPBX-2.11.0(11.17.1).
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE.
Supported: replaces, timer.
WWW-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=MD5, realm="asterisk", nonce="59e39692".
Content-Length: 0.
.
But Kamailio is not sending authentication .
Any idea what could be wrong? Or any tip to do what i try.
The idea is that a sip endpoint register with authentication on kamailio and it sends register with authentication to asterisk.
Thanks in advance
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users