21 Apr
2005
21 Apr
'05
4:38 p.m.
Martin Koenig writes:
I, from a user's point of view, am against the
reversal of this
backport. I like the functionality in 0_9_0 alot and think it is very
useful. However, Juha's point regarding performance remains valid.
there are lots of things i like in unstable branch and which i would
like to get officially committed to rel_0_9_0, but haven't proposed or
done any, because i thought that as advertized, rel_0_9_0 is a frozen
branch, where only bug fixes were allowed to be committed.
if the rules have changed, perhaps i'm allowed to commit lcr module, for
example, to rel_0_9_0? either we re-open the branch or we don't.
the auth rpid changes that were committed yesterday, will force me to
change in MANY rel_0_9_0 proxies the way radius returns caller rpid,
i.e., the chance is not backwards compatible.
is there anyone in charge here?
-- juha