Re: [SR-Users] incorrect port 0 in reply from rtp proxy

This is how I configured rtpproxy. Not sure why rtpproxy is not engaged both ways. Thanks for your help. root@Kamailio:/etc/default# more rtpproxy # Defaults for rtpproxy # The control socket. #CONTROL_SOCK="unix:/var/run/rtpproxy/rtpproxy.sock" # To listen on an UDP socket, uncomment this line: LISTEN_ADDR=public ip address CONTROL_SOCK="udp:localhost:22222" # Additional options that are passed to the daemon. EXTRA_OPTS="-l ${LISTEN_ADDR}" root@Kamailio:/etc/default# ##kamailio.cfg## #!ifdef WITH_NAT loadmodule "nathelper.so" loadmodule "rtpproxy.so" #!endif # ----- rtpproxy params ----- modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:127.0.0.1:22222") # ----- nathelper params ----- modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) modparam("nathelper", "sipping_bflag", FLB_NATSIPPING) modparam("nathelper", "sipping_from", "sip:pinger@mydomain.com") # params needed for NAT traversal in other modules modparam("nathelper|registrar", "received_avp", "$avp(RECEIVED)") modparam("usrloc", "nat_bflag", FLB_NATB) #!endif # Caller NAT detection route route[NAT] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT force_rport(); if (nat_uac_test("19")) { if (method=="REGISTER") { fix_nated_register(); } else { fix_nated_contact(); } setflag(FLT_NATS); } #!endif return; } route[RELAY] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT if (check_route_param("nat=yes")) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); } if (isflagset(FLT_NATS) || isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) { route(RTPPROXY); } #!endif # RTPProxy control route[RTPPROXY] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT if (is_method("BYE")) { unforce_rtp_proxy(); } else if (is_method("INVITE")){ force_rtp_proxy(); } if (!has_totag()) add_rr_param(";nat=yes"); #!endif return; } On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> wrote: