19 Apr
2005
19 Apr
'05
5:46 p.m.
- if request has rpid header, "from uri" is
taken from it instead of
from header.
with "from uri" have you in mind the rules that apply to lcr algorithm, not
change the from HF in the sending INVITE??
My thought is correct or I'm misunderstanding somenthing??
So, If I call the load_gw and next_gw functions before append_rpid_hf_p (without any other
RPID HF present), nothing should change with your module..
Many thanx
Verbal
----- Original Message -----
From: "Juha Heinanen" <jh(a)tutpro.com>
To: "Francesco Bottà" <francesco.botta(a)eutelia.it>
Cc: "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro>ro>; "SER developer
mailing list" <serdev(a)lists.iptel.org>rg>; "serusers"
<serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>rg>; "Andreas Granig"
<andreas.granig(a)inode.info>
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Serdev] Auth* changes
Francesco Bottà writes:
the problem is not in your module lcr (backported for
rel
0.9.0)....I've recompiled your lcr module without patch (lcr.diff)
that introduced gw_cap (prefix) features and all still working
fine....at this point the problem seems to be related with the
lcr.diff patch committed from A. Granig that in some way overrides
the rpid_avp values....
ok. i read through lcr code anyway and found one bug, but that was
related to a debug statement and didn't write anything anywhere. i also
did some cleanups and introduced one new feature:
- if request has rpid header, "from uri" is taken from it instead of
from header.
hope that suits everybody. i'll commit my changed after testing and
will also make a new rel_0_9_0 backport.
Have you ever tryed the patch introduced by A. Granig?
no, i haven't.
-- juha