14 Sep
2005
14 Sep
'05
5:28 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bogdan,
Fistrly, thanks for your answer!
Reading some old posts about 'branch=0' I found some one saying that it happend
because SER forward statelessly, but I'm using "t_relay()" and I suppose
it's a
statefull function, does'n it?
I saw this question many times in serusers maillist but no one answer it!
According with RFC3261 'branch=0' is not a valid branch ID (I know I can use
syn_branch=0)!
Best regards.
- --
============================================
Rodrigo P. Telles <telles(a)devel.it>
Diretor de Tecnologia
Devel-IT - http://www.devel.it
============================================
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Rodrigo,
as I see in that email, the problem is actually a broken ACK which
doesn't match the INVITE transaction and statelessly loops on the proxy
- when statelessly fwded, the ACK gets branch=0 param in VIA.
so, what is your problem? - the actually presents of branch=0 or why it
gets there?
regards,
bogdan
Rodrigo P. Telles wrote:
Hi folks,
I've been experiencing some troubles with ACK's with branch=0.
I found a thread about it but I didn't find a 'solution' folowing the
thread.
http://mail.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2005-April/004296.html
Can some one point me to the correct answer for that question?
Thanks in advance.
--
============================================
Rodrigo P. Telles <telles(a)devel.it>
TI Manager
Devel-IT - http://www.devel.it
============================================
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDKEGhiLK8unYgEMQRAlOHAJ4ufRDMaOizWX5TIsdN0aL5WDDypwCdEOZv
GD+1ajtmD7JlabMMG7K0QS4=
=YkTR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----