10 Sep
2013
10 Sep
'13
8:45 a.m.
Dear Alex
100% positive that both are using the same db_mode parameter for usrloc,
and yes they both share the same database and table the only different
table is the accounting table. Both kamailio servers work great and newly
registered users through site can logon just fine to both systems and make
calls, it is this location table issue that is killing me as I have scripts
that do various functions by accessing the location table.
Regards
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>wrote;wrote:
On 09/10/2013 08:37 AM, Ali Jawad wrote:
--
*Ali Jawad
*
*Information Systems Manager
CISSP - PMP - ITIL V3 - RHCE - VCP - C|EH - CCNA - MCSA
*
*Splendor Telecom (www.splendor.net)
Beirut, Lebanon
Phone: +9611373725/ext 116
FAX: +9611375554
*
Dear All
I do have two kamailio servers, same firewall same config the only
difference is the listening IPs, and the alias name, they do use the
same database. And both insert accounting information into different
tables.
My issue is that one kamailio does correctly store users in the location
table for one of the kamailio servers but it does do so for the second
kamailio, I did apply *diff *to both kamailio.cfg and kamctlrc and the
only thing that is different is IPs/Alias/Accounting table names.
Are you sharing both the database and the table among the two Kamailio
instances, or just sharing the database and using different tables?
Are you sure that your db_mode parameter for usrloc is the same on both
servers?
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
______________________________**_________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-**users<http:/…