Is Record-Route: a,b,c
analog of
Record-Route: a Record-Route: b Record-Route: c
or
Record-Route: c Record-Route: b Record-Route: a
?
On Thursday 14 October 2010, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Morten Isaksen writes:
When OpenSer sends the message to Kamailio the recourd-routes look like this:
Record-Route: sip:x.x.248.20;r2=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d131b Record-Route: sip:x.x.248.20;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d131b
But when the message comes back from Kamailio it is: Record-Route: sip:x.x.248.7;lr=on;ftag=3d9e7d131b;did=584.1a683a45,sip:x.x.248.20;r2 =on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d131b,sip:x.x.248.20;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d 131b
OpenSER forwards the message to the OCS with Record-route unchanged and the OCS gets confused and does not reply.
then file a bug to ocs folks, because ocs should understand r-r header that contains more than one entry.
-- juha
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users