28 Nov
2006
28 Nov
'06
5:07 p.m.
Hi Samuel,
I'm just curious:
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 11:34, samuel wrote:
I'll try to summarize differences and I would
apreciate *technical*
corrections to it (it's almost impossible to have an update
list....fortunately, i've tried to enumerate diferences in the dev
versions which will soon become stable):
*openSER:
o1)detailled documentation, including howtos
o2)fast reaction in the mailing list from the core developers
o3)incorporate user comments into new features
o4)decentralised developers
What do you mean by this point: are you afraid that all the SER or OpenSER
developers are striked out by an atomic nuke?
Nils
o5)improved usrloc (loading on mem, cacheless)
o6)gaining user acceptance->biggest testing comunity
*SER
s1)improved TCP code
s2)improved timers
s3)easier integration with SEMS/SERWEB
I have tried to be as opbjective as possible (but everyone knows it's
almost impossible) and it would be great to create a common place to
share experiences with both projects as someone has proposed but I
guess everyone is really really busy right now...
Samuel.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Dipl. Inform. Nils Ohlmeier
Quality Assurance Manager
iptelorg GmbH
Am Borsigturm 11
13507 Berlin
Germany
nils.ohlmeier(a)iptelorg.com
www.iptelorg.com
T +49-30-325132 22
T +49-700-IPTELORG
F +49-30-6908 8248