9 Jun
2008
9 Jun
'08
10:26 p.m.
El Lunes, 9 de Junio de 2008, Anatoly Pidruchny escribió:
Daniel,
thank you, that works! But then, currently it does not make any sense to
call t_relay() with a parameter when $du is set, because the parameter
is going to be ignored. The priority of either $du or the parameter of
t_relay() is not really clear from the documentation. But, IMHO, the
parameter of t_relay function has to have greater priority then $du. Any
comments? Should I open a bug report for this?
I agree with you. It makes sense that a explicit destination set
as "t_relay()" parameter should be the final destination instead of Route
headers.
Please, report a bug about it :)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo