28 Sep
2011
28 Sep
'11
6:46 a.m.
Hello,
On 9/28/11 12:31 PM, Henning Westerholt wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2011, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla wrote:
I agree, I expressed my
opinion for the case someone looks for backward
compatibility, so there can be added a parameter that will allow that.
At some point in the (near :-) ) future, we may want auto-discover for
IPv6 only, not for IPv4, because IPv4 will be sporadically used, just
for some very old and crappy SIP phones (we have today).
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
[default binding for IPv6]
Hi Daniel,
in my opinion the IPv6 behaviour should be consistent to the one in IPv4 -
this is probably what out users expect anyway. So if we really need another
cfg parameter for this, the default should be like in IPv4. Do you think this patch is of interest for 3.2
release?
can you push it in a personal branch to review the impact on the
existing code. It is of interest, of course, ultimately there can be a
parameter (cfg or command line) to control it.