22 Jun
2007
22 Jun
'07
3:41 a.m.
Maybe you can describe in a bit more detail the situation where SER is
supposed to CANCEL the other branches, but does not?
g-)
samuel wrote:
Hi all,
Just a question about transaction matching in SER 0.9.7:
In a forked request, SER receives a reply with a ;received=IP
parameter after the branch parameter in the Via header and I don't
know if this can affect parallel forking because it does not CANCEL
the other branches....
Thanks,
Samuel.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers